United States of America et al v. Soliz

Filing 3

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/5/2009 ORDERING Respondent Max Soliz, Sr. to appear on 10/1/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows, to show cause why the respondent should not be compelled to obey the Internal Revenue Service summons issued 3/31/2009. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 L A W R E N C E G. BROWN U n ite d States Attorney Y O S H IN O R I H. T. HIMEL #66194 A s s is ta n t United States Attorney E a ste rn District of California 5 0 1 I Street, Suite 10-100 S a c ra m e n to , California 95814-2322 T e le p h o n e : (916) 554-2760 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA, and C H A R L E S DUFF, Revenue Officer, In te rn a l Revenue Service, P e titio n e r s, v. M A X SOLIZ, SR., R e sp o n d e n t. 2 :0 9 - m c - 0 0 0 6 8 - G E B -G G H O R D E R TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT T a x p a ye r: MAX SOLIZ INSURANCE A G E N C Y , INC. D a te : Thursday, October 1, 2009 T im e : 10:00 a.m. C trm : 24, 8 th Floor ( H o n . Gregory G. Hollows) Upon the petition of LAWRENCE G. BROWN, United States Attorney for the E a ste rn District of California, and the Exhibit attached thereto, including the verification o f Revenue Officer CHARLES DUFF, it is hereby: O R D E R E D that the Respondent, MAX SOLIZ, SR., appear before United States M a g is tra te Judge Gregory G. Hollows, in that Magistrate Judge's courtroom in the United S ta te s Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, on Thursday, October 1, 2009, at 1 0 :0 0 a.m., to show cause why the respondent should not be compelled to obey the In te rn a l Revenue Service summons issued on March 31, 2009. It is further ORDERED that: 1 . The undersigned United States Magistrate Judge intends to preside, under to 28 U .S .C . Section 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72-302(c)(9), at the hearing scheduled above. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A f te r hearing, the Magistrate Judge intends to submit proposed findings and rec o m m en d atio n s under Local Rule 304(a), with the original thereof filed by the Clerk a n d a copy provided to all parties. 2 . The court hereby appoints the group manager of the petitioning Internal R ev en u e Service employee, and all federal employees designated by that group manager, u n d e r Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1), to serve process in this case. 3 . A copy of this order, the Verified Petition and its Exhibit, and the Points and A u th o ritie s, shall be served by delivering a copy to the respondent personally or by le a v in g a copy at the respondent's dwelling house or usual place of abode with some p e rso n of suitable age and discretion then residing therein, within 21 days of the date this o rd e r is served upon the United States Attorney, unless such service cannot be made d e s p i te reasonable efforts. 4 . If the federal employee assigned to serve these documents is unable to serve th e m as provided in paragraph 3, despite making reasonable efforts to do so, the d o c u m e n ts may be served by any other means of service permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) o r petitioners may request a court order granting leave to serve by other means. See Fed. R . Civ. P. 81(a)(5). The federal employee assigned to serve the documents shall make a c e rtif ic a te detailing the efforts made within the 21-day period to serve the respondent as p ro v id e d in paragraph 3. 5 . Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 3 or 4, above, shall be filed w ith the Clerk as soon as practicable. 6 . The file reflects a prima facie showing that the investigation is conducted p u rs u a n t to a legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose, that the in f o rm a tio n sought is not already within the Commissioner's possession, and that the a d m in istra tiv e steps required by the Code have been followed. United States v. Powell, 3 7 9 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964). The burden of coming forward therefore has shifted to w h o e v e r might oppose enforcement. /// ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 . If the respondent has any defense or opposition to the petition, such defense or o p p o s itio n shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk and a copy served on the U n ite d States Attorney at least 10 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing. 8 . At the show cause hearing, the Magistrate Judge intends to consider the issues p r o p e r ly raised in opposition to enforcement. Only those issues brought into controversy b y the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit will be considered. Any u n c o n te s te d allegation in the petition will be considered admitted. 9. The respondent may notify the Court, in a writing filed with the Clerk and s e rv e d on the United States Attorney at least 10 days prior to the date set for the show c a u se hearing, that the respondent has no objections to enforcement of the summons. The re sp o n d e n t's appearance at the hearing will then be excused. D A T E D : August 5, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE d u f f .o s c ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS ENFORCEMENT Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?