Daniels et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Filing 181

JUDGMENT signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/8/14. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is Hereby Ordered Against Plaintiff Maria Aguilar and in Favor of Defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California SCOTT H. WYCKOFF, State Bar No. 191367 Supervising Deputy Attorney General KRISTIN M. DAILY, State Bar No. 186103 Deputy Attorney General AMY LINDSEY-DOYLE Deputy Attorney General, State Bar No. 242205 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 445-6989 Fax: (916) 324-5567 E-mail: Kristin.Daily@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 YVETTE DANIELS, MARIA AGUILAR 2:10-CV-00003-MCE-AC AND KAREN CURRIE, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, JUDGMENT 16 Plaintiffs, 17 18 19 20 v. Judge: The Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. Action Filed: December 31, 2009 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Defendants. 21 22 Pursuant to this Court’s order on November 20, 2013, ECF No. 97, granting Defendant 23 24 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s motion for summary judgment against 25 Plaintiff Maria Aguilar, 26 /// 27 28 1 JUDGMENT - AGUILAR (2:10-CV-00003-MCE-AC) 1 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ORDERED AGAINST 2 PLAINTIFF MARIA AGUILAR AND IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA 3 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 8, 2014 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JUDGMENT - AGUILAR (2:10-CV-00003-MCE-AC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?