Rasheed v. Department of Justice

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/7/2010 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED w/out prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

(PC) Rasheed v. Department of Justice

Doc. 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3769a(b) and 3769b(a)(1), and California Penal Code § 1170.12. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). By an order filed May 25, 2010, the court denied plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis on the basis that the "three strikes" provision of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act bars the court from granting him that status. Order (Doc. No. 5), filed May 25, 2010 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). Plaintiff was ordered to pay the $350.00 filing fee, within thirty days, or this action would be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court's order. ///// ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAHEE ABDULLAH RASHEED, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0013 DAD P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:4 rash0013.dism

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. DATED: July 7, 2010.

2