Coffin v. Evans

Filing 45

ORDER adopting 41 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/1/13: Respondent's motion to dismiss 36 is denied. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition within 60 days. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ROBERT COFFIN, 11 12 13 14 Petitioner, vs. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent. 15 16 No. 2:10-cv-26 JAM EFB P ORDER / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a 17 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 18 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 15, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 22 Respondent has filed objections to the findings and recommendations and petitioner has filed a 23 response thereto. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 1 1 proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 15, 2013, are adopted in full; 4 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Dckt. No. 36) is denied; and 5 3. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition within 60 days. 6 DATED: April 1, 2013 7 8 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?