Draper v. Rosairo et al
Filing
137
AMENDED ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/3/14. The parties' MOTIONS on limine are due by 4/7/14, oppositions due by 4/14/14, and any replies by 4/21/14. The parties should inform the court whether resolution of any of the motion s might require an evidentiary presentation. Each party is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to the same. If no objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of this court.(Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 4/3/2014 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN CLINT DRAPER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:10-CV-0032 KJM EFB
v.
AMENDED ORDER
D. ROSARIO, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
On March 20, 2014, the court conducted a final pretrial conference. Victor Meng, Robert
17
18
O’Leary and Judson Lobdell appeared for plaintiff Draper, who was present in court; David
19
Carrasco and Rene Lucaric appeared telephonically for defendant Rosario.
After hearing, and good cause appearing, the court makes the following findings and
20
21
orders:
22
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a). Jurisdiction and venue are not
23
24
contested.
25
JURY/NON-JURY
The parties have requested a jury trial and agree to an eight member jury.
26
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
UNDISPUTED FACTS
2
3
1. California State Prison-Solano is a medium security institution operated by the
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR).
4
5
2. On September 9, 2009, plaintiff John Clint Draper was an inmate housed in Building
Four at CSP-Solano.
6
3. Draper was classified as mobility impaired and was authorized to use a cane.
7
4. Defendant David Rosario was a correctional officer assigned to CSP-Solano and on
8
September 9, 2009 was working as a floor officer in Building Four.
9
5. Correctional Officer Pyong Chan Lee was working as the control booth officer and
10
Correctional Officer Eddie Coulter was working as a floor officer in Building Four on September
11
9, 2009.
12
13
6. Coulter, Lee and Rosario were the only officers assigned to working in Building Floor
during the morning of September 9, 2009.
14
7. Around 11:30 a.m., Rosario ordered Draper to report to the office in Building Four.
15
8. When Draper reported to the office, Coulter and Rosario were there and Lee was in
16
the control booth.
17
9. Rosario talked to Draper about the latter’s work performance as a porter.
18
10. Draper disagreed with Rosario’s assessment and the two got into a verbal exchange in
19
the dayroom outside the office.
20
21
11. Rosario ordered Draper to drop his cane and put his hands behind his back so Rosario
could handcuff Draper.
22
12. Draper complied and Rosario handcuffed him
23
13. The incident involving Draper and Rosario took place in the Day Room of Building
24
Four, immediately in front of the sally port grill gate.
25
14. Lee activated his personal alarm as the result of the incident and CDCR officers
26
arrived in response.
27
/////
28
/////
2
1
DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES1
2
1. Whether Rosario slammed Draper into the sally port grill gate in Building Four.
3
2. Whether Draper jumped off the sally port grill gate and launched himself backwards at
4
Rosario in an attempt to assault Rosario.
5
6
3. Whether Rosario slammed Draper’s head into the ground while Draper was face down
on the ground.
7
8
4. Whether Draper suffered any injury as the result of the incident or, if he did, the extent
of any injuries.
9
10
5. Whether a registered nurse adequately examined Draper after the incident.
SPECIAL FACTUAL INFORMATION
11
12
None applicable.
DISPUTED EVIDENTIARY ISSUES/MOTIONS IN LIMINE
13
The parties will submit their motions in limine in accordance with the schedule set below,
14
except for plaintiff’s request to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, which shall be
15
addressed according to the schedule set by ECF No. 130.
16
The parties’ motions on limine are due by April 7, oppositions due by April 14, and any
17
replies by April 21, 2014. The parties should inform the court whether resolution of any of the
18
motions might require an evidentiary presentation.
19
STIPULATIONS/AGREED STATEMENTS
20
The parties have stipulated as to the following facts:
21
1. Rosario acted under color of state law.
22
2. The medical records offered as plaintiff’s exhibits 1-60 and defendants’ exhibits 7-35
23
are authentic.
24
3. The photographs of Building Four taken on January 22, 2014 and offered as plaintiff’s
25
exhibit 66 and defendant’s exhibit 35 are authentic.
26
1
27
28
The court acknowledges plaintiff’s claim that the question whether a post-incident interview
with plaintiff was properly handled is in dispute, but does not include that in the disputed facts as
it is not part of the claim itself, but rather may provide a basis for a jury instruction or other
action. As the parties observed, this will be addressed during the motions in limine.
3
1
4. Defendant’s proposed exhibits 1-6, documents from plaintiff’s central file, are
2
authentic.
3
RELIEF SOUGHT
4
Plaintiff seeks compensatory or nominal damages, punitive damages, costs and attorneys’
5
fees. Defendant seeks a judgment in his favor and an award of costs.
6
POINTS OF LAW
7
The parties shall alert the court to disputes about the applicable law and legal standards.
8
Trial briefs addressing these points more completely shall be filed with this court no later than
9
seven days prior to the date of trial in accordance with Local Rule 285.
10
11
ABANDONED ISSUES
The court granted defendant’s motions to dismiss Draper’s claim that his Fourteenth
12
Amendment right to procedural due process was violated, that his Eighth Amendment right was
13
violated by prison officials’ deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs, and that he was
14
subjected to a biased disciplinary hearing.
15
WITNESSES
16
Plaintiff intends to call the following witnesses:
17
John Clint Draper
18
Richard Shepard, CDC No. H40705
19
Frank Thompson, Jr. CDC No. C07772
20
Mario Thompson, CDC No. T54097
21
James Fowler, Correctional Sergeant
22
Allen Peel, Correctional Sergeant
23
John Edward Mitchell, CDC No.H38255
24
Michael Dwayne Haynes, CDC No. J78758
25
Dr. Martin Chenevert—expert witness
26
Custodians of records
27
Grant Fine, potential impeachment witness
28
Defendant intends to call the following witnesses:
4
1
David Rosario
2
Pyong Chun Lee
3
Edward Coulter
4
Dr. Bruce Barnett—rebuttal expert
5
Custodians of records.
6
Each party may call any witnesses designated by the other.
7
A.
The court will not permit any other witness to testify unless:
8
(1) The party offering the witness demonstrates that the witness is for the purpose
9
of rebutting evidence that could not be reasonably anticipated at the pretrial
10
conference, or
11
(2) The witness was discovered after the pretrial conference and the proffering
12
party makes the showing required in “B,” below.
13
B.
Upon the post pretrial discovery of any witness a party wishes to present at trial,
14
the party shall promptly inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of the unlisted
15
witnesses so the court may consider whether the witnesses shall be permitted to testify at trial.
16
The witnesses will not be permitted unless:
17
(1) The witness could not reasonably have been discovered prior to the
18
discovery cutoff;
19
(2) The court and opposing parties were promptly notified upon discovery
20
of the witness;
21
(3) If time permitted, the party proffered the witness for deposition; and
22
(4) If time did not permit, a reasonable summary of the witness’s testimony
23
was provided to opposing parties.
24
25
26
27
28
EXHIBITS, SCHEDULES AND SUMMARIES
Plaintiff’s exhibits are identified on attachment A. At trial, plaintiff’s exhibits shall be
listed numerically.
Defendant’s exhibits are identified on attachment B. At trial, defendant’s exhibits shall be
listed alphabetically.
5
1
2
The court encourages the parties to generate a joint exhibit list to the extent possible.
Joint Exhibits shall be identified as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2.
3
All exhibits must be premarked.
4
The parties must prepare exhibit binders for use by the court at trial, with a side tab
5
identifying each exhibit in accordance with the specifications above. Each binder shall have an
6
identification label on the front and spine.
7
8
The parties must exchange exhibits no later than twenty-eight days before trial. Any
objections to exhibits are due no later than fourteen days before trial.
9
10
A. The court will not admit exhibits other than those identified on the exhibit lists
referenced above unless:
11
1. The party proffering the exhibit demonstrates that the exhibit is for the purpose
12
of rebutting evidence that could not have been reasonably anticipated, or
13
2. The exhibit was discovered after the issuance of this order and the proffering
14
party makes the showing required in Paragraph “B,” below.
15
B. Upon the discovery of exhibits after the discovery cutoff, a party shall promptly
16
inform the court and opposing parties of the existence of such exhibits so that the court may
17
consider their admissibility at trial. The exhibits will not be received unless the proffering party
18
demonstrates:
19
1. The exhibits could not reasonably have been discovered earlier;
20
2. The court and the opposing parties were promptly informed of their existence;
21
3. The proffering party forwarded a copy of the exhibits (if physically possible) to
22
the opposing party. If the exhibits may not be copied the proffering party must
23
show that it has made the exhibits reasonably available for inspection by the
24
opposing parties.
25
DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS
26
Counsel must lodge the sealed original copy of any deposition transcript to be used at trial
27
with the Clerk of the Court no later than fourteen days before trial.
28
/////
6
1
FURTHER DISCOVERY OR MOTIONS
2
Discovery closed on October 6, 2012. The court granted plaintiff’s motion to reopen
3
discovery and set a new discovery deadline of January 31, 2014.
4
The parties do not anticipate additional discovery.
5
AMENDMENTS/DISMISSALS
6
7
As noted above, several claims were dismissed during the course of the litigation.
SETTLEMENT
8
9
On February 6, 2014, he parties attended a settlement conference conducted by the
Honorable Dale A. Drozd. The case did not settle and the parties do not believe a further
10
settlement conference will be helpful.
11
JOINT STATEMENT OF THE CASE
12
13
The parties should submit a joint statement of the case fourteen days before trial.
SEPARATE TRIAL OF ISSUES
14
15
The parties do not seek a separate trial of any issues.
IMPARTIAL EXPERTS/LIMITATION OF EXPERTS
16
Not applicable.
17
ATTORNEYS' FEES
18
.
19
ESTIMATED TIME OF TRIAL/TRIAL DATE
20
Plaintiff will seek attorneys’ fees if he is the prevailing party.
Jury trial is set for May 5, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom Three before the Honorable
21
Kimberly J. Mueller. Trial is anticipated to last three to four days. The parties are directed to
22
Judge Mueller’s trial schedule outlined at the “important information” link located on her web
23
page on the court’s website.
24
PROPOSED JURY VOIR DIRE AND PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
25
26
27
28
The parties shall file any proposed jury voir dire seven days before trial. Each party will
be limited to ten minutes of jury voir dire.
The court directs counsel to meet and confer in an attempt to generate a joint set of jury
instructions and verdicts. The parties shall file any such joint set of instructions fourteen days
7
1
before trial, identified as “Jury Instructions and Verdicts Without Objection.” To the extent the
2
parties are unable to agree on all or some instructions and verdicts, their respective proposed
3
instructions are due fourteen days before trial.
4
Counsel shall e-mail a copy of all proposed jury instructions and verdicts, whether agreed
5
or disputed, as a word document to kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov no later than fourteen days
6
before trial; all blanks in form instructions should be completed and all brackets removed.
7
Objections to proposed jury instructions must be filed seven days before trial; each
8
objection shall identify the challenged instruction and shall provide a concise explanation of the
9
basis for the objection along with citation of authority. When applicable, the objecting party
10
shall submit an alternative proposed instruction on the issue or identify which of his or her own
11
proposed instructions covers the subject.
12
MISCELLANEOUS
13
14
15
Trial briefs are due seven days before trial.
OBJECTIONS TO PRETRIAL ORDER
Each party is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to the
16
same. If no objections are filed, the order will become final without further order of this court.
17
DATED: April 3, 2014.
18
19
20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
1
ATTACHMENT A
2
PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBIT LIST
3
4
5
#
Date
Document
Bates Number
Plaintiff’s Medical Records
1.
January 25, 1994
X-Ray Request
DRAPER002302
6
2.
December 12, 2007
Radiology Report
DRAPER001463
7
3.
May 6, 2008
Radiology Report
DRAPER000494
8
4.
December 10, 2008
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER000148
5.
December 22, 2008
Comprehensive Accommodation Chrono
DRAPER000531
6.
August 20, 2009
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER000126
7.
August 26, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000492
8.
September 9, 2009
Medical Report of Injury or Unusual
Occurrence
Dkt. 70-3 at 13
9.
September 11, 2009
Health Care Services Request Form
Dkt. 65-1 at 21
10.
September 17, 2009
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER000124-5
14
11.
September 17, 2009
Physician’s Orders
DRAPER000623
15
12.
September 28, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000490
16
13.
September 28, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000491
14.
October 20, 2009
Health Services Request Form
Dkt. 65-1 at 20
9
10
11
12
13
17
15.
October 29, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000489
18
16.
November 1, 2009
Health Services Request Form
Dkt. 65-1 at 19
19
17.
November 5, 2009
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER003786
20
18.
November 16, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000487
19.
November 16, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000488
20.
November 22, 2009
Health Services Request Form
Dkt. 65-1 at 18
21.
June 8, 2010
Health Care Servies Request Form
DRAPER003784
23
22.
July 21, 2010
Report by Salinas Valley Radiologists, Inc.
DRAPER000486
24
23.
July 29, 2010
Physician Request for Services
Dkt. 65-1 at 7
25
24.
July 29, 2010
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
Dkt. 65-1 at 8
25.
June 8, 2010
Health Care Services Request Form
DRAPER003784
26.
July 21, 2010
Report by Salinas Valley Radiologists, Inc.
DRAPER000486
27.
February 9, 2011
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER003795
21
22
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF JOHN CLINT DRAPER’S EXHIBIT LIST
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00032-KJM-EFB
sf-3397311
1
1
#
Date
Document
Bates Number
2
28.
May 23, 2011
Health Care Services Request Form
Dkt. 65-1 at 14
3
29.
November 1, 2011
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000114
30.
January 20, 2012
Encounter Form: Musculoskeletal
Complaint (Non-Traumatic)
DRAPER000096-8
5
31.
January 31, 2012
Physician Request for Services
DRAPER000553
6
32.
January 31, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000094
33.
February 29, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
Dkt. 65-1 at 5
34.
March 5, 2012
Health Care Services Request Form
DRAPER000085
35.
March 8, 2012
Report by Valley Radiology Medical
Associates, Inc.
DRAPER000481483
36.
April 11, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000084
4
7
8
9
10
37.
May 2, 2012
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER000082
11
38.
May 9, 2012
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER000081
12
39.
May 16, 2012
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER000080
13
40.
May 23, 2012
Interdisciplinary Progress Notes
DRAPER000076
41.
June 25, 2012
Health Care Services Request Form
DRAPER000074
42.
July 10, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000073
43.
July 10, 2012
Refusal of Examination and/or Treatment
DRAPER000547
44.
August 1, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER00006869
45.
August 31, 2012
Medical Progress Note
DRAPER00006465
46.
September 11, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000062
47.
September 30, 2012
Electromyography/Nerve Conduction Study
DRAPER000474–
80
48.
October 11, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000061
49.
November 21, 2012
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000058
50.
January 25, 2013
Encounter Form: Musculoskeletal
Complaint (Non-Traumatic)
DRAPER00005355
51.
January 29, 2013
Health Care Services Request Form
DRAPER000051
52.
February 6, 2013
Refusal of Examination and/or Treatment
DRAPER000538
53.
April 4, 2013
Health Care Services Request Form
DRAPER002429
54.
April 15, 2013
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000048
55.
June 7, 2013
Encounter Form: Musculoskeletal
Complaint (Non-Traumatic)
DRAPER00003941
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF JOHN CLINT DRAPER’S EXHIBIT LIST
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00032-KJM-EFB
sf-3397311
2
1
#
Date
Document
Bates Number
2
56.
June 11, 2013
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER000037
3
57.
October 15, 2013
Health Care Services Request Form
DRAPER001467
58.
October 17, 2013
Encounter Form: Musculoskeletal
Complaint (Non-Traumatic)
DRAPER001468–
69
59.
December 4, 2013
Health Care Services, Physician Request for
Services
DRAPER002427
60.
December 9, 2013
Report by California Correctional Health
Care Services
DRAPER00229697
4
5
6
7
8
Miscellaneous
61.
Diagram of Building Four, California State
Prison, Solano
62.
California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, Adult Institutions, Program,
and Parole, Operations Manual
63.
California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, Richard A. McGee
Correctional Training Center, Cadet
Handbook
9
10
11
12
13
15
64.
September 9, 2009
Videotape Interview of John Clint Draper
65.
September 30, 2009
Videotape Interview of John Clint Draper
66.
14
January 22, 2014
Photographs of California State Prison,
Solano
16
17
67.
Rule 1006 Summary of Medical Records
Concerning Right Upper Extremity
18
19
Medical Text
68.
Renfree K.J., and T.W. Wright, Anatomy
and biomechanics of the acromioclavicular
and sternoclavicular joints, Clin. Sports
Med. 2003;22: 219–237
69.
Shaffer B.S., Painful conditions of the
acromioclavicular joint, J. Am. Acad.
Orthop. Surg. 1999;7(3):176
70.
Koehler, Scott M., Acromioclavicular joint
injuries, UpToDate, available online at
http://www.uptodate.com (May 13, 2013)
71.
Koehler, Scott M., Acromioclavicular joint
disorders, UpToDate, available online at
http://www.uptodate.com (January 14,
2014)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF JOHN CLINT DRAPER’S EXHIBIT LIST
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00032-KJM-EFB
sf-3397311
3
1
2
#
73.
Jing Jin, et al., Factors affecting therapeutic
compliance: A review from the patient’s
perspective, 4 Ther. & Clin. Risk Mgmt.
269 (February 2008)
74.
Alex J. Mitchell and Thomas Selmes, Why
don't patients take their medicine? Reasons
and solutions in psychiatry, 13 Advances in
Psychiatric Treatment 336 (2007)
75.
Silk, K.R., Personality disorders, in: A.
Skodol (Ed.), UpToDate (2014)
76.
Carol S. North M.D., M.P.E., and Sean H.
Yutzy M.D., The Psychiatric Diagnosis, In
Goodwin and Guze's Psychiatric Diagnosis
(6th Ed.) (Oxford University Press, Inc.
2010)
6
8
9
10
11
12
Bates Number
Miller, Marc L., Muscle examination in the
evaluation of weakness, UpToDate,
available online at
http://www.uptodate.com (August 23, 2012)
5
7
Document
72.
3
4
Date
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF JOHN CLINT DRAPER’S EXHIBIT LIST
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00032-KJM-EFB
sf-3397311
4
ATTACHMENT B
DEFENDANT’S TRIAL EXHIBITS—AMENDED LIST
No.
Date
Document
Reference
Plaintiff’s Central File Documents
1.
October 16, 1991
Abstract of Judgment
DRAPER002555
2.
September 9, 2009
Rules Violation Report
DRAPER0002790-95
3.
September 9, 2009
Medical Report of Injury
Dkt. 70-3 at 13
4.
September 9, 2009
Inmate Account of Excessive Force
Dkt. 70-3 at 42
5.
September 16, 2009
Incident Commander’s Review/Critique
Dkt. 70-3 at 44-53
6.
October 7, 2009
Memorandum on Interviews with Inmates
Dkt. 70-3 at 36-41
Plaintiff’s Medical File Documents
7.
April 23, 2003
Radiology Report
DRAPER000497
8.
December 4, 2006
Radiology Report
DRAPER000496
9.
April 30, 2008
Physician Order
DRAPER000650
10.
April 30, 2008
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
DRAPER000152
11.
May 6, 2008
Radiology Report
DRAPER000494
12.
December 10, 2008
Physician’s Order
DRAPER000642
13.
December 10, 2008
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
DRAPER000148
14.
August 20, 2009
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
DRAPER000126
15.
August 26, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000492
16.
September 26, 2009
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
DRAPER000124-25
17.
September 28, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000490
18.
September 28, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000491
19.
October 29, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000489
20.
November 5, 2009
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
DRAPER003786
21.
November 16, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000487
22.
November 16, 2009
Radiology Report
DRAPER000488
23.
January 6, 2010
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
24.
June 9, 2010
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
25.
July 27, 2010
MRI Report
DRAPER000486
26.
July 29, 2010
Health Care Services Request
Dkt. 65-1 at 7
No.
Date
Document
Reference
27.
July 29, 2010
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
Dkt. 65 at 11
28.
August 11, 2010
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
29.
January 20, 2011
Interdisciplinary Progress Note
30.
January 11, 2011
Reasonable Accommodation Request
DRAPER003793-94
31.
February 9, 2011
Primary Care Provider Progress Note
DRAPER003795
32.
February 11, 2011
Health Care Services Request
Dkt. 65-1 at 15
33.
March 8, 2012
X-ray Reports
DRAPER000481-83
OtherExhibits
34.
January 22, 2014
3/24/2014
Photos of Incident Scene, CSP-Solano
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?