Draper v. Rosairo et al
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/29/12 ordering that plaintiff's 06/25/12 request 59 is denied. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JOHN CLINT DRAPER,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:10-cv-0032 KJM EFB P
Defendant.
11
ORDER
vs.
D. ROSARIO,
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
17
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a “notice of motion for deposition and discovery” with the
18
court, wherein, he requests that the court order the Attorney General’s Office and the California
19
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide him with information regarding this
20
case. Dckt. No. 59. Plaintiff is hereby informed that he may obtain the information he seeks by
21
properly serving discovery requests on defendants, and his request for court assistance at this
22
time appears to be both unnecessary and premature. Pursuant to this court’s local rules,
23
interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, and responses thereto “shall not
24
be filed with the clerk” unless there is a proceeding that puts the discovery request or response at
25
issue. See E.D. Cal. Local Rules 250.2-250.4. As it appears that plaintiff has not even served
26
his discovery requests on defendants, there is no discovery request or response at issue.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 25, 2012 request, Dckt.
2
No. 59, is denied.
3
DATED: June 29, 2012.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?