Draper v. Rosairo et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/29/12 ordering that plaintiff's 06/25/12 request 59 is denied. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN CLINT DRAPER, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:10-cv-0032 KJM EFB P Defendant. 11 ORDER vs. D. ROSARIO, / 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a “notice of motion for deposition and discovery” with the 18 court, wherein, he requests that the court order the Attorney General’s Office and the California 19 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide him with information regarding this 20 case. Dckt. No. 59. Plaintiff is hereby informed that he may obtain the information he seeks by 21 properly serving discovery requests on defendants, and his request for court assistance at this 22 time appears to be both unnecessary and premature. Pursuant to this court’s local rules, 23 interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, and responses thereto “shall not 24 be filed with the clerk” unless there is a proceeding that puts the discovery request or response at 25 issue. See E.D. Cal. Local Rules 250.2-250.4. As it appears that plaintiff has not even served 26 his discovery requests on defendants, there is no discovery request or response at issue. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 25, 2012 request, Dckt. 2 No. 59, is denied. 3 DATED: June 29, 2012. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?