Rodriguez v. Dickinson et al
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/5/11 DENYING 35 Motion for Reconsideration. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
CARMELO RODRIGUEZ,
11
12
13
Petitioner,
No. CIV S-10-0048 LKK GGH P
vs.
KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, et al.,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
17
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a motion for the undersigned to
18
reconsider the April 12, 2011, order denying plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of time to
19
file briefing.
20
On February 4, 2011, the undersigned ordered both parties to provide briefing
21
regarding the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Swarthout v. Cooke, 502 U.S.
22
___, 131 S. Ct. 859, 861 (2011).
23
On February 25, 2011, petitioner was granted a 30 day extension to file briefing.
24
Plaintiff filed a motion to stay, that was denied, but did not file briefing. Plaintiff’s second
25
motion for an extension was denied on April 12, 2011. Plaintiff was informed that he could raise
26
any issues he desired in objections to the findings and recommendations that were issued on
1
1
April 29, 2011. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration to the order denying a second extension is
2
denied, as plaintiff can still file objections to the findings and recommendations and raise any
3
issues that could have been raised before.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration
5
(Doc. 35) be denied.
6
DATED: May 5, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
___________________________________
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
GGH: AB
rodr0048.ord2
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?