Rodriguez v. Dickinson et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/5/11 DENYING 35 Motion for Reconsideration. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARMELO RODRIGUEZ, 11 12 13 Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-0048 LKK GGH P vs. KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, et al., 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a motion for the undersigned to 18 reconsider the April 12, 2011, order denying plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of time to 19 file briefing. 20 On February 4, 2011, the undersigned ordered both parties to provide briefing 21 regarding the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Swarthout v. Cooke, 502 U.S. 22 ___, 131 S. Ct. 859, 861 (2011). 23 On February 25, 2011, petitioner was granted a 30 day extension to file briefing. 24 Plaintiff filed a motion to stay, that was denied, but did not file briefing. Plaintiff’s second 25 motion for an extension was denied on April 12, 2011. Plaintiff was informed that he could raise 26 any issues he desired in objections to the findings and recommendations that were issued on 1 1 April 29, 2011. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration to the order denying a second extension is 2 denied, as plaintiff can still file objections to the findings and recommendations and raise any 3 issues that could have been raised before. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration 5 (Doc. 35) be denied. 6 DATED: May 5, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows ___________________________________ GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 GGH: AB rodr0048.ord2 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?