Walker v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/7/2010 DENYING pltf's 18 motion for reconsideration. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC)Walker v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants / On September 15, 2010, plaintiff requested reconsideration of the undersigned's orders denying plaintiff's request that a fellow inmate and non-attorney, be appointed as plaintiff's counsel of choice. See Dckt. Nos. 13, 17, 18. Although motions to reconsider are directed to the sound discretion of the court, Frito-Lay of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Canas, 92 F.R.D. 384, 390 (D.C. Puerto Rico 1981), considerations of judicial economy weigh heavily in the process. Thus, Local Rule 230(j) requires that a party seeking reconsideration of a district court's order must brief the "new or different facts or circumstances . . . [which] were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion." The rule derives from the "law of the case" doctrine which provides that the decisions on legal issues made in a case "should be followed unless there is substantially different evidence . . . new controlling authority, or the prior decision was clearly erroneous and would result in injustice." Handi Investment Co. v. Mobil Oil 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL JAMES WALKER, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0053 WBS EFB P ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Corp., 653 F.2d 391, 392 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Waggoner v. Dallaire, 767 F.2d 589, 593 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1064 (1986). Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any new or different facts or circumstances which did not exist or were not shown upon the prior motions, and thus, his motion is denied. See L.R. 230(j). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's September 15, 2010 motion for reconsideration is denied. DATED: October 7, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?