Adoma v. The University of Phoenix, Inc. et al

Filing 132

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/25/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff may file their third Amended Complaint withing three (2) days following this order. Defendant will not be required to file a response to Plaintiff's third amended complaint.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton Depart: 4 Date Filed: January 8, 2010 Plaintiff, 17 18 Case No.: CV10-00059-LKK-GGH DIANE ADOMA, an individual, and MICHELLE ABBASZADEH, an individual, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and on behalf of The State of California Labor and Workforce Development Agency as a Private Attorney General vs. THE UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC. 20 , AN ARIZONA CORPORATION; 21 APOLLO GROUP, INC., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION; 22 23 24 Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED: 25 26 27 1. Plaintiff may file their third amended complaint (“TAC”) within three (3) days following this order. 28 -1- 1 2 2. Defendant will not be required to file a response to Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”). 3 4 5 DATED: April 25, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?