Adoma v. The University of Phoenix, Inc. et al
Filing
132
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/25/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff may file their third Amended Complaint withing three (2) days following this order. Defendant will not be required to file a response to Plaintiff's third amended complaint.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
19
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO FILE THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
Depart: 4
Date Filed: January 8, 2010
Plaintiff,
17
18
Case No.: CV10-00059-LKK-GGH
DIANE ADOMA, an individual, and
MICHELLE ABBASZADEH, an
individual, on behalf of themselves and
others similarly situated and on behalf of
The State of California Labor and
Workforce Development Agency as a
Private Attorney General
vs.
THE UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC.
20 , AN ARIZONA CORPORATION;
21
APOLLO GROUP, INC., AN ARIZONA
CORPORATION;
22
23
24
Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
25
26
27
1. Plaintiff may file their third amended complaint (“TAC”) within three (3)
days following this order.
28
-1-
1
2
2. Defendant will not be required to file a response to Plaintiff’s third
amended complaint (“TAC”).
3
4
5
DATED: April 25, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?