Bartholomew v. Swarthout

Filing 28

ORDER denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/15/11. (Plummer, M)

(HC) Bartholomew v. Swarthout

Doc. 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
GGH:mp; bart0073.110(2)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN BARTHOLOMEW, Petitioner, vs. GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent. / Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's March 7, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 23) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. DATED: March 15, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER No. CIV S-10-0073 WBS GGH P

Dockets.Justia.com