Witkin v. Yates
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/4/2012 ORDERING that the 55 findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2011, are ADOPTED in full. Petitioner's April 4, 2011 39 motion for reconsideration and petitioner's November 28, 2011 53 motion for reconsideration are GRANTED. This court's March 10, 2011 order is VACATED. This matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MICHAEL AARON WITKIN,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. 2:10-cv-0091 GEB DAD (HC)
vs.
JAMES A. YATES, Warden,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On December 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
2
3
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2011, are adopted in
full;
2. Petitioner’s April 4, 2011 motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 39) and
petitioner’s November 28, 2011 motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 53) are granted;
5
3. This court’s March 10, 2011 order is vacated; and
6
4. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
7
Dated: January 4, 2012
8
9
10
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?