Benson v. Davis Enterprise Newspaper et al
Filing
128
ORDER ADOPTING 84 and 107 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/2/2011 DENYING 60 , 73 and 86 Motions for Injunctive Relief. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JEREMY JAMISON aka
DWAYNE GARRETT,
11
Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-10-0124 KJM EFB P
12
vs.
13
BAILEY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner who is now represented by counsel, has filed this civil
17
rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The instant
19
motions seek injunctive relief.
20
On March 9 and June 21, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and
21
recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that
22
any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days from
23
the date the findings and recommendations were served. Plaintiff has filed objections to the
24
March 9, 2011 findings and recommendations.
25
26
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file,
1
1
the court finds both sets of findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
2
the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9 and June 21, 2011, are
5
adopted in full;
6
7
2. Plaintiff’s December 22, 2010 motion for injunctive relief is denied. See ECF
No. 73;
8
9
3. Plaintiff’s December 3, 2010 motion for injunctive relief is denied. See ECF
No. 60; and
10
4. Plaintiff’s March 10, 2011 motion for injunctive relief is denied. See ECF No.
11
86.
12
DATED: August 2, 2011.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?