Anderson et al v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Filing
57
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/9/2011 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
R. PARKER WHITE
State Bar No. 95579
POSWALL, WHITE & CUTLER
1001 G Street, Suite 301
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 449-1300
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KANDY ANDERSON and DOUGLAS
ANDERSON,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
15
16
SELECT COMFORT RETAIL
CORPORATION, a Minnesota
corporation, and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
17
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00128-DAD (TEMP)
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO
FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a) AND ORDER
18
19
20
Plaintiffs, KANDY ANDERSON and DOUGLAS ANDERSON, and defendant,
21
SELECT COMFORT RETAIL CORPORATION, have reached a resolution of this
22
matter. The parties agree to dismiss this action in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to
23
Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). Each party to bear their own fees and costs.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00128-DAD (TEMP)
1
The parties seek the Court’s approval of dismissal of this action with prejudice
2
through the order listed infra.
3
Dated: March 18, 2011
POSWALL, WHITE & CUTLER
4
5
By__/s/ R. Parker White____________
R. PARKER WHITE
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KANDY ANDERSON and DOUGLAS
ANDERSON
6
7
8
Dated: March 17, 2011
OPPENHEIMER WOLFF &
DONNELLY, LLP
9
10
By__/s/ Heidi A. O. Fisher___________
HEIDI A. O. FISHER
Attorneys for Defendant
SELECT COMFORT RETAIL
CORPORATION
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 9, 2011.
17
18
19
20
dad1
anderson10cv1028.stipdismiss
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00128-DAD (TEMP)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?