Lucas v. Salinas
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/28/10 ORDERING that 3 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED as unnecessary; Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to file an amended petition within 30 days from the date of this order; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the form for habeas corpus application. (Dillon, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Petitioner has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Since petitioner has paid the filing fee, the court will deny petitioner's motion as unnecessary. 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL LUCAS, Petitioner, vs. S.M. SALINAS, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.1 Under Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, a petition for writ of habeas corpus must "be signed under penalty of perjury by the petitioner or by a person authorized to sign it for the petitioner . . . ." Petitioner has failed to sign his habeas petition. Accordingly, the instant petition must be dismissed with leave to amend. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's January 19, 2010 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 3) is denied as unnecessary; ORDER No. CIV S-10-0136 DAD P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
2. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to file an amended petition within thirty days from the date of this order; 3. Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court, must be signed, and must state all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action and must bear the title "Amended Petition"; and 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner the form for habeas corpus application. DATED: January 28, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?