Chatman et al v. Bank of America Home Loans et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/21/11 ORDERING that the hearing date of 4/28/11 is vacated. Hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is continued to 6/9/11 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26; Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than 5/26/11. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT JULIUS CHATMAN et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 vs. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. 10-cv-0141 LKK JFM PS This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 17 On March 10, 2011, defendant Bank of America Home Loans filed a motion to dismiss pursuant 18 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). No opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. 19 Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be 20 filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o 21 party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition 22 to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides 23 that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in 24 sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 25 grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 26 inherent power of the Court.” 1 1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The hearing date of April 28, 2011 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion 3 to dismiss is continued to June 9, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26. 4 2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than 5 May 26, 2011. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement 6 of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to 7 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 8 DATED:April 21, 2011. 9 10 11 12 /014;chat0141.nooppo 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?