Muhammad v. Sisto et al

Filing 31

ORDER SUBSTITUTING ATTORNEY signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/21/10 ordering defendants Vaughn, Hayward and Ridge hereby substitute attorneys Martha M. Stringer and Kathleen L. Williams in place of the Attorney General. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Muhammad v. Sisto et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290 Sacramento, CA 95822 (916) 456-1122 (916) 737-1126 (fax) Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333 Attorneys for defendants VAUGHN, HAYWARD and RIDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHAKA S. MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, vs. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: 2:10-cv-00143-DAD SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS Defendants VAUGHN, HAYWARD and RIDGE hereby substitute the following counsel in place and in stead of the Attorney General of California: Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333 W ILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 1250 Sutterville Road, Suite 290 Sacramento, CA 95822 (916) 456-1122 (916) 737-1126 (fax) // // // // // // Muhammad v Sisto [2:10-cv-00143] Substitution of Attorneys Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 All counsel in this matter are requested to direct all communications to the above-referenced address beginning immediately. I consent to this substitution. Dated: September 15, 2010 By: /s/Barry D. Alves Barry D. Alves, CSB #232971, Attorney for defendants, VAUGHN, HAYWARD and RIDGE I accept this substitution. Dated: September 17, 2010 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Muhammad v Sisto [2:10-cv-00143] Substitution of Attorneys Page 2 DAD:sj muha0143.sub By:_/s/Martha M. Stringer Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 21, 2010.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?