Reece v. Sisto et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/05/15 ordering the court has reviewed the second amended complaint and finds that it states potentially cognizable Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims against defendants Sisto and Mimis. Defendants shall respond to the complaint in accordance with Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES G. REECE,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:10-cv-0203-JAM-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §1915A

D.K. SISTO, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action

18

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has reviewed the second amended complaint (ECF

19

No. 53) and for the limited purposes of § 1915A screening and liberally construed, finds that it

20

states potentially cognizable Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims against defendants Sisto

21

and Mimis. Defendants shall respond to the complaint in accordance with Rule 12 of the Federal

22

Rules of Civil Procedure.

23

So ordered.

24
25
26
27
28

DATED: June 5, 2015.