Santos v. United Nations et al

Filing 6

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/3/2010 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice re 1 Complaint filed by Latisha Santos. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PS)Santos v. United Nations et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. UNITED NATIONS, et al., Defendants. / By order filed May 19, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given in the May 19, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LATISHA SANTOS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0220 JAM GGH PS FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 1 2 3 4 5 Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: August 3, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 s a n t o s 0 2 2 0 . f ta 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?