Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group et al

Filing 14

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/17/10 ORDERING the clerk of the court assign a District Judge to this case. U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that all defendants but Kadevari be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed April 22, 2010, the court determined that plaintiff had stated a colorable claim against defendant Kadevari. The court also dismissed plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants with twenty-eight days leave to amend. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that all defendants but Kadevari be dismissed 1 ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN SCOTT SEEFELDT, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0247 GGH P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

from this action without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: August 17, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
GGH: AB seef247.b3

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE