Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group et al

Filing 5

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/11/10 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 same as the complaint filed in CIV-S-10-0247 GGH P. Because that case was filed first, the court will recommend that this case be dismissed. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a District Judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. These findings and recommendations are submitted to a United States District Judge pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the 1 vs. CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., Defendants. / A review of court records indicates that the complaint filed in this case is the ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN S. SEEFELDT, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0263 KJM P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 11, 2010. 1 seef0263.dup 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?