California Earthquake Authority v. Metropolitan West Securities LLC, et al
Filing
126
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/22/2013 GRANTING parties' 125 Joint Motion for relief from 85 Scheduling Order. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses is now due 5/1/2013. Supplemental Disclosure to be submitted by 5/28/2013. The last day to hear Dispositive Motions shall be on 9/5/2013. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
Michael J. Strumwasser (SBN 58413)
Fredric D. Woocher (SBN 96689)
Patricia T. Pei (SBN 274957)
STRUMWASSER & WOOCHER LLP
10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2000
Los Angeles, California 90024
Telephone:
+1 310 576 1233
Facsimile:
+1 310 319 0156
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE AUTHORITY
7
8
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
14
David C. Powell (SBN 129781)
David S. Reidy (SBN 225904)
Jennifer R. Fearnow (SBN 246007)
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
+1 415 543 8700
Facsimile:
+1 415 391 8269
Attorneys for Defendants
METROPOLITAN WEST SECURITIES, LLC
and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor
by merger to WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE AUTHORITY,
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff,
vs.
METROPOLITAN WEST SECURITIES, LLC;
WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.; and DOES 1 through
25,
No.: 2:10-CV-00291 MCE (GGH)
JOINT REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM
COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER AND
[ORDER
Date action removed: February 4, 2010
Trial date: January 13, 2014
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
No.: 2:10-CV-00291 MCE (GGH)
–1–
JOINT REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
US_ACTIVE-111632248.1-JRFEARNO
WHEREAS on December 31, 2009, Plaintiff California Earthquake Authority (“Plaintiff”)
1
2
filed its Verified Complaint in this Action.
3
WHEREAS Defendants Metropolitan West Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
4
successor by merger to Wachovia Bank N.A. (“Defendants”) removed this action on February 4,
5
2010;
6
WHEREAS this Court issued a Scheduling Order on August 3, 2010 (see Docket No. 33);
7
WHEREAS on July 22, 2011, the Parties jointly requested relief from the Court’s Scheduling
8
Order (see Docket No. 36);
REED SMITH LLP
WHEREAS on July 25, 2011, Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. issued a Scheduling Order in this
10
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
9
case providing that that disclosure of expert witnesses is due by March 20, 2012, a supplemental list
11
of expert witnesses is due by April 10, 2012, expert discovery cut-off is May 10, 2012, and the last
12
day to hear dispositive motions shall be July 13, 2012 (see Docket No. 37);
13
14
WHEREAS on August 31, 2011, the action was reassigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.
(see Docket No. 38);
15
WHEREAS on October 24, 2011, this Court issued an Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order
16
providing that that disclosure of expert witnesses is due by September 13, 2012, and the last day to
17
hear dispositive motions shall be January 10, 2013 (see Docket No. 39);
18
19
20
WHEREAS on March 21, 2012, the Parties further jointly requested relief from the Court’s
Scheduling Order (see Docket No. 42);
WHEREAS on March 27, 2012, this Court issued a Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling
21
Order providing that disclosure of expert witnesses is due by February 7, 2013, a supplemental list of
22
expert witnesses is due by February 27, 2013, and the last day to hear dispositive motions shall be
23
June 13, 2013 (see Docket No. 46);
24
25
WHEREAS on October 24, 2012, this Court issued an Order Continuing Trial. The October
7, 2013 jury trial date was vacated and continued to January 13, 2014. (see Docket No. 85);
26
WHEREAS fact discovery closed on December 3, 2012;
27
WHEREAS the Parties desire to mediate the case to explore settlement, and anticipate
28
attending mediation in March 2013;
No.: 2:10-CV-00291 MCE (GGH)
–2–
JOINT REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
WHEREAS the Parties believe that an adjustment to the Second Amended Pretrial
1
2
Scheduling Order would permit them to focus their efforts on mediation;
3
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiff California
4
Earthquake Authority and Defendants Metropolitan West Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Bank,
5
N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A., through the undersigned counsel, to jointly
6
request relief from the Second Amended Pretrial Scheduling Order in this case, and request that the
7
presently scheduled dates be moved as followed, or in accordance with such schedule as the Court
8
may allow:
9
Present Schedule
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
14
Expert Witness
Disclosure/Report
Supplemental
Disclosure/Report
Last Day to Hear Dispositive
Motion
Jointly Requested Schedule
February 7, 2013
May 1, 2013
February 27, 2013
May 28, 2013
June 13, 2013
September 5, 20131
15
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
17
DATED: January 9, 2013
18
REED SMITH LLP
19
20
By
21
22
23
24
///
25
/s/ David S. Reidy
David S. Reidy
Attorneys for Defendants
Metropolitan West Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia
Bank, N.A.
///
26
27
1 Parties to comply with the filing schedule outlined in this Court’s Second Amended Pretrial
Scheduling Order (Docket No. 46, p. 4).
28
No.: 2:10-CV-00291 MCE (GGH)
–3–
JOINT REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
1
DATED: January 9, 2013
STRUMWASSER & WOOCHER LLP
2
By
3
4
/s/ Michael J. Strumwasser
Michael J. Strumwasser
Attorneys for Plaintiff
California Earthquake Authority
5
IT IS SO ORDERED:
6
7
8
Dated: January 22, 2013
9
_________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
12
13
DEAC_Signature-END:
14
15
c4d6b0d3
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No.: 2:10-CV-00291 MCE (GGH)
–4–
JOINT REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?