Berry v. Jacquez

Filing 64

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/3/13: Petitioner's Reply Brief is due February 8, 2013.(Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 John Balazs, SBN: 157287 Attorney at Law 916 Second Street, 2nd Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 447-9299. Facsimile: (916) 557-1118 Email: john@balazslaw.com Attorney for Petitioner Donald Joseph BERRY 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 DONALD JOSEPH BERRY, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, 15 16 Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-cv-0305 WBS JFM (HC) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR REPLY BRIEF 17 18 19 Petitioner, Donald Joseph Berry, through his undersigned counsel, and Respondent, through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the 20 21 deadline for Petitioner’s Reply to Respondent’s answer be continued from January 22 8, 2013 to February 8, 2013. 23 24 25 A continuance is necessary because Petitioner’s counsel needs to consult with petitioner, needs additional time to prepare the reply, and has briefs due in the 26 27 Ninth Circuit on December 31, 2012 in United States v. Ermoian, 11-10124, on 28 1 1 January 14, 2013 in United States v. McElmurry, No. 12-50183, and on January 2 25, 2013 in United States v. Mujahid, Nos. 11-30276 & 12-30070. 3 Accordingly, the parties request that the Court extend the due date for 4 5 petitioner’s Reply Brief from January 8, 2013 to February 8, 2013. 6 7 Dated: January 2, 2013 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General 8 9 By: /s/ Robert Todd Marshall Robert Todd Marshall Deputy Attorney General [signed with permission] 10 11 12 Dated: January 2, 2013 By: /s/ John Balazs for JOHN BALAZS Attorney for Petitioner Donald Joseph BERRY 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Date: 1/3/2013 21 22 23 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 DEAC_Signature-END: 26 9cekb3i 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?