Williams v. Dickinson

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/23/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 24 and respondent's motion to dismiss 21 GRANTED; this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedy. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

(HC) Williams v. Dickinson

Doc. 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. K. DICKINSON, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 1, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HENRY C. WILLIAMS, III, Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-0310 LKK DAD P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 remedies.

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 1, 2011, are adopted in full; 2. Respondent's June 30, 2010 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 21) is granted; and 3. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court

DATED: March 23, 2011.

2