Guerrero v. McClure et al
Filing
112
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/11/13 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 3/1/13 100 are ADOPTED in full; and Defendants' 8/17/12 MOTION for Summary Judgment 83 is GRANTED and Summary Judgment is entered in favor of defendants Fecht, Ferguson and Fox. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES ANTHONY GUERRERO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:10-cv-00318 TLN DAD P
v.
ORDER
S. McCLURE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 1, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. After three extensions of
23
time, plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 1, 2013 are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendants’ August 17, 2012 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 83) is granted
4
and summary judgment is entered in favor of defendants Fecht, Ferguson and Fox.
5
6
Dated: September 11, 2013
7
8
9
/guer0318.805
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?