Ludwig v. Adult Protective Services of Sacramento County et al

Filing 69

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/1/11 ORDERING the Law Firm of Evans, Wieckowski & Ward, LLP accepts service of the summons and the first amended complaint on behalf of VERNA MAGNUSON; VERNA MAGNUSON is deemed to have joined in the County's motion to dismiss heard on 9/21/11 and agrees to be bound by that ruling as to Count Two of the First Amended Complaint without prejudice to filing a Motion to Dismiss as to Count One of the First Amended Complaint. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4

DAVID J. BEAUVAIS (SB# 84275)
409 13th Street, 20th Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
SUSAN LUDWIG

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
SUSAN LUDWIG,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

) No. 2:10-CV-00325-JAM-EFB
)
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
) RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
vs.
)
)
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; VERNA
)
MAGNUSON in her individual capacity as
)
social worker for Sacramento County Adult
)
Protective Services; CITY OF SACRAMENTO; )
A. CROSBY in his individual capacity as a
)
police officer for the City of Sacramento;
)
OFFICER MULLIGAN in his individual
)
capacity as a police officer for the City of
)
Sacramento; DOES 1-5 in their individual
)
capacities as police officers for the City of
)
Sacramento; McKINLEY HEALTH CARE
)
CENTER, Inc.; CATHOLIC HEALTH CARE )
WEST dba MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL; )
DOES 6 through 10 in their individual
)
capacities as employees of the State of
)
California employed at UC Davis Medical
)
Center; DOES 11 through 20,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________________)

24
Plaintiff, SUSAN LUDWIG, through her counsel, DAVID J. BEAUVAIS and the COUNTY OF
25
SACRAMENTO through its counsel, CAROL A. WEICKOWSKI of EVANS, WIECKOWSKI & WARD,
26
LLP enter into the following stipulation:
27
28

Stipulation and Order re Motion to Dismiss

1
2

1. The law firm of EVANS, WIECKOWSKI & WARD, LLP accepts service of the summons and the
first amended complaint on behalf of VERNA MAGNUSON.

3

2. VERNA MAGNUSON is deemed to have joined in the County’s motion to dismiss heard on

4

September 21, 2011 and agrees to be bound by that ruling as to Count Two of the First Amended Complaint

5

without prejudice to filing a Motion to Dismiss as to Count One of the First Amended Complaint.

6

Dated: October 28, 2011

7
/s/ David J. Beauvais
DAVID J. BEAUVAIS
Attorney for Plaintiff
SUSAN LUDWIG

8
9
10
11
12

Dated: October 25, 2011

13

/s/ Carol A. Wieckowski
CAROL A. WIECKOWSKI
Attorney for Defendant
VERNA MAGNUSON

14
15
16
17

ORDER
18
IT IS SO ORDERED
19
Dated:

11/1/2011

20
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Stipulation and Order re Motion to Dismiss

-2-