Kirk v. Richards

Filing 87

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff will be provided 21 days to file additional evidentiary materials regarding defendant's 78 motion for summary judgment, but it is not required. No extensions will be given. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY W. KIRK, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-0373 GEB CKD P vs. T. RICHARDS, 14 Defendant. 15 ORDER / 16 Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Woods v. Carey, No. 09-15548 17 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), the court hereby reminds plaintiff of the following requirements for 18 opposing the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Richards on April 16, 2012.1 19 (Dkt. No. 78.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 20 79, 82.) 21 The motion arises under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a 22 motion is a request for an order for judgment in favor of the defendant without trial. A 23 defendant’s motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant contends are 24 not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. To oppose a motion 25 26 1 Plaintiff was also advised of these requirements on May 12, 2010. (Dkt. No. 9.) 1 1 for summary judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in 2 one or more of the following ways. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made under 3 penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge 4 of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies those parts of the complaint on which plaintiff relies. 5 Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that 6 plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must 7 have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely on written records, but plaintiff 8 must prove that the records are what plaintiff asserts they are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any 9 part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions 10 obtained in this proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendant’s evidence with 11 counteraffidavits or other admissible evidence, the court may accept defendant’s evidence as true 12 and grant the motion. If there is some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff 13 when required to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the court will consider a request to 14 postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). If plaintiff does 15 not serve and file a written opposition to the motion, or a request to postpone consideration of the 16 motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s 17 motion. See L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the motion for summary judgment, whether opposed 18 or unopposed, judgment will be entered for the defendant without a trial and the case will be 19 closed as to that defendant. 20 Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations 21 not signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. 22 //// 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 2 1 Plaintiff now having received the notice required under Woods v. Carey, No. 09- 2 15548 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff will be provided 21 days 3 to file additional evidentiary materials regarding defendant’s motion for summary judgment, but 4 it is not required. No extensions will be given. 5 Dated: July 11, 2012 6 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 1 kirk0373.not 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?