Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLC

Filing 186

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/30/12 GRANTING defendant's 175 Request to Appear Telephonically at the 06/07/12 hearing on the Motion to Compel. Defendant's counsel, Rita M. Aliss Powers and Marc B. Koenigsberg, may appear at the hearing by telephone. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BEST BUY STORES, L.P., a Virginia Limited Partnership, 11 Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-00389 WBS KJN 12 v. 13 14 MANTECA LIFESTYLE CENTER, LLC, 15 Defendant. ORDER 16 17 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 18 ________________________________/ 19 Presently before the court is defendant’s counsel’s request to appear by telephone 20 at the June 7, 2012 hearing on defendant’s motion to compel further discovery regarding recent 21 closures of certain Best Buy Stores.1 The request was made by defendant’s lead trial counsel, 22 who is located in Chicago, Illinois, and its local counsel. The undersigned grants defendant’s 23 counsel’s request. 24 //// 25 1 26 This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Defendant’s counsel’s request to appear by telephone at the June 7, 2012 3 hearing on defendant’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 175) is granted. Defendant’s counsel, Rita 4 M. Aliss Powers and Marc B. Koenigsberg, may appear at the hearing by telephone. 5 2. Defendant’s counsel shall promptly contact the undersigned’s Courtroom 6 Deputy at (916) 930-4187, and provide him with a dedicated, hard telephone line at which the 7 court may contact defendant’s counsel at the time of the hearing. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 30, 2012 10 11 12 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?