Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLC
Filing
186
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/30/12 GRANTING defendant's 175 Request to Appear Telephonically at the 06/07/12 hearing on the Motion to Compel. Defendant's counsel, Rita M. Aliss Powers and Marc B. Koenigsberg, may appear at the hearing by telephone. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BEST BUY STORES, L.P., a Virginia
Limited Partnership,
11
Plaintiff,
No. 2:10-cv-00389 WBS KJN
12
v.
13
14
MANTECA LIFESTYLE CENTER,
LLC,
15
Defendant.
ORDER
16
17
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
18
________________________________/
19
Presently before the court is defendant’s counsel’s request to appear by telephone
20
at the June 7, 2012 hearing on defendant’s motion to compel further discovery regarding recent
21
closures of certain Best Buy Stores.1 The request was made by defendant’s lead trial counsel,
22
who is located in Chicago, Illinois, and its local counsel. The undersigned grants defendant’s
23
counsel’s request.
24
////
25
1
26
This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local
Rule 302(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Defendant’s counsel’s request to appear by telephone at the June 7, 2012
3
hearing on defendant’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 175) is granted. Defendant’s counsel, Rita
4
M. Aliss Powers and Marc B. Koenigsberg, may appear at the hearing by telephone.
5
2.
Defendant’s counsel shall promptly contact the undersigned’s Courtroom
6
Deputy at (916) 930-4187, and provide him with a dedicated, hard telephone line at which the
7
court may contact defendant’s counsel at the time of the hearing.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 30, 2012
10
11
12
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?