Jones v. Barron et al
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/19/2011 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 18 motion for summary judgment. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MARCELL JONES,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
No. 2:10-cv-0396 JAM JFM (PC)
Defendant.
ORDER
vs.
K. BARRON,
15
16
17
18
/
On March 9, 2011, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
19
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
20
the granting of the motion . . . .” On June 18, 2010, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for
21
filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a
22
waiver of opposition to the motion.
23
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be
24
grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the
25
inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed June 18, 2010, plaintiff was advised that failure
26
to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the
2
date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion for summary
3
judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a
4
recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
5
DATED: April 19, 2011.
6
7
8
9
10
12
jone0396.46osc
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?