Bowell v. California Department of Corrections et al
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/10/12 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed December 13, 2011, are adopted in full; Defendant Smith's June 22, 2011 motion to dismiss 46 is granted; and Plaintiff's claim against defendant Smith is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that claim prior to bringing suit. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JAMES E. BOWELL,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC)
vs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On December 13, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff
22
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
25
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 13, 2011, are adopted in
3
full;
4
5
2. Defendant Smith’s June 22, 2011 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 46) is granted;
and
6
3. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Smith is dismissed without prejudice due to
7
plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that claim prior to bringing
8
suit.
9
DATED: February 10, 2012
10
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?