Bowell v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/10/12 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed December 13, 2011, are adopted in full; Defendant Smith's June 22, 2011 motion to dismiss 46 is granted; and Plaintiff's claim against defendant Smith is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that claim prior to bringing suit. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES E. BOWELL, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-0397 JAM DAD (PC) vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On December 13, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff 22 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 13, 2011, are adopted in 3 full; 4 5 2. Defendant Smith’s June 22, 2011 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 46) is granted; and 6 3. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Smith is dismissed without prejudice due to 7 plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that claim prior to bringing 8 suit. 9 DATED: February 10, 2012 10 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?