Williams v. Book et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/22/2010 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED w/out prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
(PC) Williams v. Book et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. IRA BOOK, et al., Defendants. / By an order filed May 19, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD A. WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0423 GEB GGH P
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
1 2 3 4 5
fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: July 22, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows
6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?