Bohman v. Quintana

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/04/10 ordering CASE TRANSFERRED to U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Respondent. / Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. He has filed this civil action on a form petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A review of petitioner's claims for relief reveals that he is not challenging the execution of his sentence or the fact or duration of his confinement. Rather, he is challenging the conditions of his confinement. For example, in his form petition plaintiff sets forth claims concerning inadequate medical care and interference with his religious practices. Moreover, petitioner's allegations relate to events that allegedly took place at the United States Penitentiary - Victorville in San Bernardino County. San Bernardino County is in an area embraced by the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, the court will transfer the matter to the district where plaintiff's civil rights claims could be properly brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NATHAN KARL BOHMAN, Petitioner, No. CIV S-10-0446 DAD P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:9 bohm0446.108mod Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. DATED: March 4, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?