Harris v. City of Redding California et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/29/12 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 GARY BRICKWOOD, State Bar No. 94892 BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE 1135 Pine Street, Suite 210 Redding, CA 96001 (530) 245-1877 (530) 245-1879 (fax) 4 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF REDDING, KIM NIEMER and MATTHEW MCCALLUM 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Case No. 2:10-CV-00487-JAM-CMK MARY HARRIS, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER CITY OF REDDING CALIFORNIA, KIM NIEMER, MATTHEW MCCALLUM, And DOES 1 through 20, 14 Defendants. 15 16 The parties to this matter have now completed their Settlement 17 Agreement and jointly request that the Court dismiss this case with 18 prejudice. 19 Enclosed with this request is a proposed Order, if any further 20 steps are necessary, please ask your Clerk to contact Brickwood Law 21 Office at your first convenience. 22 Thank you for your courtesy and attention to this matter. 23 DATED: June 28, 2012. 24 Respectfully submitted, BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE 25 _/s/ Gary Brickwood________ GARY BRICKWOOD Attorney for Defendant 26 JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 1 DATED: June 28, 2012. Respectfully submitted, 2 3 _/s/ O’Neil Dennis___________ O’Neil Dennis Attorney for Plaintiff 4 ORDER 5 6 The Court has reviewed the Joint Request for Dismissal, good 7 cause appearing, the Court orders as follows: 8 IT IS SO ORDERED that the case is dismissed in its entirety with 9 prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this file. 10 11 12 DATED: 6/29/2012 /s/ John A. Mendez JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?