Harris v. City of Redding California et al
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/29/12 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
GARY BRICKWOOD, State Bar No. 94892
BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE
1135 Pine Street, Suite 210
Redding, CA 96001
(530) 245-1877
(530) 245-1879 (fax)
4
5
6
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF REDDING, KIM NIEMER and
MATTHEW MCCALLUM
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Case No. 2:10-CV-00487-JAM-CMK
MARY HARRIS,
11
Plaintiffs,
12
vs.
13
JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND
ORDER
CITY OF REDDING CALIFORNIA,
KIM NIEMER, MATTHEW MCCALLUM,
And DOES 1 through 20,
14
Defendants.
15
16
The parties to this matter have now completed their Settlement
17
Agreement and jointly request that the Court dismiss this case with
18
prejudice.
19
Enclosed with this request is a proposed Order, if any further
20
steps are necessary, please ask your Clerk to contact Brickwood Law
21
Office at your first convenience.
22
Thank you for your courtesy and attention to this matter.
23
DATED:
June 28, 2012.
24
Respectfully submitted,
BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE
25
_/s/ Gary Brickwood________
GARY BRICKWOOD
Attorney for Defendant
26
JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
1
DATED:
June 28, 2012.
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
_/s/ O’Neil Dennis___________
O’Neil Dennis
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
ORDER
5
6
The Court has reviewed the Joint Request for Dismissal, good
7
cause appearing, the Court orders as follows:
8
IT IS SO ORDERED that the case is dismissed in its entirety with
9
prejudice.
The Clerk is directed to close this file.
10
11
12
DATED:
6/29/2012
/s/ John A. Mendez
JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?