Medina v. Dickinson et al
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/11/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff has until 8/15/2012, to provide his opposition with all supporting evidence.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RENE MEDINA,
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
No. CIV S-10-0502 LKK GGH P
KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al.,
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
17
By Order filed on May 10, 2012, the court, inter alia, ordered plaintiff to re-serve
18
his discovery requests upon defendants, directing defendants to serve responses on an expedited
19
basis. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was vacated subject to re-notice once
20
defendants had served their discovery responses, after which plaintiff was granted thirty days to
21
file his opposition (or supplemental opposition), after which defendants were given seven days to
22
file any reply. See docket # 55. Defendants re-noticed the motion for summary judgment on
23
June 27, 2012.
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
1
Plaintiff was previously informed of the requirements to oppose a motion for
1
2
summary judgment pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998).1 However,
3
in light of Woods v. Carey, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), plaintiff will
4
be informed again.
Pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc),
5
6
cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988),
7
plaintiff is advised of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment
8
made by defendants pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion
9
is a request for an order for judgment in favor of defendants without trial. A defendant’s motion
10
for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendants contend are not reasonably
11
subject to dispute and that entitle the defendants to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary
12
judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of
13
the following ways. Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the
14
complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and
15
plaintiff calls to the court’s attention those parts of the complaint upon which plaintiff relies.
16
Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that
17
plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must
18
have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely upon written records, but
19
plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff claims they are. Plaintiff may rely upon
20
all or any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or
21
admissions obtained in this proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendants’ evidence
22
with counter-affidavits or other admissible evidence, the defendants’ evidence may be taken as
23
the truth and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment granted. If there is some good
24
25
26
1
Without actually setting forth the requirements for opposing a motion for summary
judgment, defendants refer plaintiff in their notice/re-notice of motion to the Rand/Klingele notice
the court had provided previously. See docket #56.
2
1
reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required to oppose a motion for
2
summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone considering the defendants’
3
motion. If plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion or a request to
4
postpone consideration of the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of
5
opposition to the defendants’ motion. If the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, whether
6
opposed or unopposed, is granted, judgment will be entered for the defendants without a trial and
7
the case will be closed. A motion or opposition supported by unsigned affidavits or declarations
8
will be stricken.
In light of the timing of this notice, plaintiff will be granted one extension of time
9
10
to file his opposition/supplemental opposition.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is granted until August 15, 2012, to
11
12
provide his opposition with all supporting evidence.
13
DATED: July 11, 2012
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
GGH:009
16
medi0502.ord6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?