Medina v. Dickinson et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/11/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff has until 8/15/2012, to provide his opposition with all supporting evidence.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RENE MEDINA, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 No. CIV S-10-0502 LKK GGH P KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al., Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 17 By Order filed on May 10, 2012, the court, inter alia, ordered plaintiff to re-serve 18 his discovery requests upon defendants, directing defendants to serve responses on an expedited 19 basis. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was vacated subject to re-notice once 20 defendants had served their discovery responses, after which plaintiff was granted thirty days to 21 file his opposition (or supplemental opposition), after which defendants were given seven days to 22 file any reply. See docket # 55. Defendants re-noticed the motion for summary judgment on 23 June 27, 2012. 24 ///// 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Plaintiff was previously informed of the requirements to oppose a motion for 1 2 summary judgment pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998).1 However, 3 in light of Woods v. Carey, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 2626912 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012), plaintiff will 4 be informed again. Pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), 5 6 cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1035 (1999), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), 7 plaintiff is advised of the following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment 8 made by defendants pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such a motion 9 is a request for an order for judgment in favor of defendants without trial. A defendant’s motion 10 for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendants contend are not reasonably 11 subject to dispute and that entitle the defendants to judgment. To oppose a motion for summary 12 judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do this in one or more of 13 the following ways. Plaintiff may rely upon statements made under the penalty of perjury in the 14 complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge of the matters stated and 15 plaintiff calls to the court’s attention those parts of the complaint upon which plaintiff relies. 16 Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that 17 plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must 18 have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely upon written records, but 19 plaintiff must prove that the records are what plaintiff claims they are. Plaintiff may rely upon 20 all or any part of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or 21 admissions obtained in this proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendants’ evidence 22 with counter-affidavits or other admissible evidence, the defendants’ evidence may be taken as 23 the truth and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment granted. If there is some good 24 25 26 1 Without actually setting forth the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment, defendants refer plaintiff in their notice/re-notice of motion to the Rand/Klingele notice the court had provided previously. See docket #56. 2 1 reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required to oppose a motion for 2 summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone considering the defendants’ 3 motion. If plaintiff does not serve and file a written opposition to the motion or a request to 4 postpone consideration of the motion, the court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of 5 opposition to the defendants’ motion. If the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, whether 6 opposed or unopposed, is granted, judgment will be entered for the defendants without a trial and 7 the case will be closed. A motion or opposition supported by unsigned affidavits or declarations 8 will be stricken. In light of the timing of this notice, plaintiff will be granted one extension of time 9 10 to file his opposition/supplemental opposition. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is granted until August 15, 2012, to 11 12 provide his opposition with all supporting evidence. 13 DATED: July 11, 2012 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 GGH:009 16 medi0502.ord6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?