Truong, et al v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, et al

Filing 74

STIPULATION and ORDER re PARTIAL DISMISSAL signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/25/13: Defendants Craig Yonker, Dana Gilmour and Kelly Smith terminated. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP VAN LONGYEAR, CSB NO. 84189 AMANDA L. McDERMOTT, CSB NO. 253651 PETER C. ZILAFF, CSB NO. 272658 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, California 95864-5923 Tel: 916-974-8500 Fax: 916 974-8510 Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento, (Erroneously sued herein as Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department); Sgt. Jon Zwolinski; Deputy Kelly Smith; Deputy Dana Gilmour; Deputy Craig Yonker 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 LIEU THI TRUONG; PHUONG LAN TRUONG; DET VAN TRUONG; TON VAN TRUONG; and BIEU VAN TRUONG, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 Case No. 2:10-CV-00506 MCE AC Action Filed: 4/6/10 STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, as follows: 1. Defendants KELLY SMITH, DANA GILMOUR, and CRAIG YONKER shall be dismissed with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action for use of excessive force and false arrest in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments shall be dismissed with prejudice; 3. Plaintiff BIEU VAN TRUONG’s claims asserted individually as to the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action shall be dismissed with prejudice; 4. Plaintiff’s Eleventh Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code Section 51.7 shall be dismissed without prejudice; 1 5. Plaintiff’s claims relating to racial and/or national origin profiling, animus, or 2 discrimination as asserted in the First, Second, and Fourth Causes of Action shall be 3 dismissed without prejudice; and 4 6. All parties to bear their own fees and costs as to the above claims. 5 7. The case otherwise remains active with respect to the remaining claims and defendants. 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 Dated: June 20, 2013 8 By: /s/ Kenneth N. Frucht KENNETH N. FRUCHT FREDERICK J. GEONETTA Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP Dated: June 20, 2013 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP By: /s/ Van Longyear . VAN LONGYEAR Attorney for Defendants, County of Sacramento Sgt. Jon Zwolinski, Kelly Smith, Dana Gilmour, and Craig Yonker ORDER Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 18 1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice with respect to the claims asserted 19 against Defendants KELLY SMITH, DANA GILMOUR, and CRAIG YONKER, with 20 each side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs; 21 2. Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action, for use of excessive force and false arrest in violation 22 of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each 23 side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs; 24 3. Plaintiff BIEU VAN TRUONG’s claims asserted individually as to the Fourth, Fifth, 25 Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each 26 side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs; 27 28 Stipulation for Partial Dismissal and [Proposed] Order Page 2 1 4. Plaintiff’s Eleventh Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code Section 51.7 against all 2 defendants shall be dismissed without prejudice, with each side to bear their own 3 attorney’s fees and costs; and 4 5. Plaintiff’s claims relating to racial and/or national origin profiling, animus, or 5 discrimination as asserted in the First, Second, and Fourth Causes of Action shall be 6 dismissed without prejudice, with each side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 25, 2013 9 10 11 ___________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation for Partial Dismissal and [Proposed] Order Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?