Truong, et al v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, et al
Filing
74
STIPULATION and ORDER re PARTIAL DISMISSAL signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/25/13: Defendants Craig Yonker, Dana Gilmour and Kelly Smith terminated. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
VAN LONGYEAR, CSB NO. 84189
AMANDA L. McDERMOTT, CSB NO. 253651
PETER C. ZILAFF, CSB NO. 272658
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, California 95864-5923
Tel: 916-974-8500 Fax: 916 974-8510
Attorneys for Defendants, County of Sacramento,
(Erroneously sued herein as Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department);
Sgt. Jon Zwolinski; Deputy Kelly Smith; Deputy Dana Gilmour; Deputy Craig Yonker
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
LIEU THI TRUONG; PHUONG LAN
TRUONG; DET VAN TRUONG; TON
VAN TRUONG; and BIEU VAN
TRUONG,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
Case No. 2:10-CV-00506 MCE AC
Action Filed: 4/6/10
STIPULATION FOR PARTIAL
DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON
v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties to this action, by and
through their undersigned counsel, as follows:
1. Defendants KELLY SMITH, DANA GILMOUR, and CRAIG YONKER shall be
dismissed with prejudice;
2. Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action for use of excessive force and false arrest in violation of
the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments shall be dismissed with prejudice;
3. Plaintiff BIEU VAN TRUONG’s claims asserted individually as to the Fourth, Fifth,
Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action shall be dismissed with prejudice;
4. Plaintiff’s Eleventh Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code Section 51.7 shall be
dismissed without prejudice;
1
5. Plaintiff’s claims relating to racial and/or national origin profiling, animus, or
2
discrimination as asserted in the First, Second, and Fourth Causes of Action shall be
3
dismissed without prejudice; and
4
6. All parties to bear their own fees and costs as to the above claims.
5
7. The case otherwise remains active with respect to the remaining claims and defendants.
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
Dated: June 20, 2013
8
By: /s/ Kenneth N. Frucht
KENNETH N. FRUCHT
FREDERICK J. GEONETTA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP
Dated: June 20, 2013
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
By: /s/ Van Longyear
.
VAN LONGYEAR
Attorney for Defendants, County of
Sacramento Sgt. Jon Zwolinski,
Kelly Smith, Dana Gilmour, and
Craig Yonker
ORDER
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
18
1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice with respect to the claims asserted
19
against Defendants KELLY SMITH, DANA GILMOUR, and CRAIG YONKER, with
20
each side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs;
21
2. Plaintiff’s Third Cause of Action, for use of excessive force and false arrest in violation
22
of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each
23
side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs;
24
3. Plaintiff BIEU VAN TRUONG’s claims asserted individually as to the Fourth, Fifth,
25
Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Causes of Action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each
26
side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs;
27
28
Stipulation for Partial Dismissal and [Proposed] Order
Page 2
1
4. Plaintiff’s Eleventh Cause of Action for Violation of Civil Code Section 51.7 against all
2
defendants shall be dismissed without prejudice, with each side to bear their own
3
attorney’s fees and costs; and
4
5. Plaintiff’s claims relating to racial and/or national origin profiling, animus, or
5
discrimination as asserted in the First, Second, and Fourth Causes of Action shall be
6
dismissed without prejudice, with each side to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 25, 2013
9
10
11
___________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation for Partial Dismissal and [Proposed] Order
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?