Hall et al v. City of Fairfield et al

Filing 179

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/25/2013 ORDERING that a Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for 4/12/2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned. The Jury Trial, estimated length of approximately twelve court days, is set to commence on 4/29/2013, at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MARKUS M. HALL, MONIQUE G.
RANKIN, LINDSEY K. SANDERS,

11
12

Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:10-cv-0508 DAD

v.
CITY OF FAIRFIELD, OFFICER NICK
ORDER
McDOWELL, OFFICER CHRIS GRIMM,
OFFICER TOM SHACKFORD, OFFICER
ZACK SANDOVAL, AND SERGEANT
STEVE CRANE,

17

Defendants.

18

/

19

This case came before the court on January 25, 2013, for a status conference.

20

Garret Murai, Esq. and Edwin Wilson, Esq. appeared telephonically for plaintiffs. Kevin Gilbert,

21

Esq. appeared telephonically for defendants.

22

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

23

1. A Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for April 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., at the

24

United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

the undersigned.1 Any party may appear at the Trial Confirmation Hearing telephonically if the

2

party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the

3

undersigned magistrate judge, at [phone], no later than 48 hours before the Trial

4

Confirmation Hearing; a land line telephone number must be provided.

5

2. The Jury Trial, estimated length of approximately twelve court days, is set to

6

commence on April 29, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned.

7

DATED: January 25, 2013.

8
9
10
11
12
13

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.consent\hall0508.oah.012513

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1

25
26

To the extent any party wishes to file a brief in advance of the trial confirmation hearing
raising issues that they request the court rule upon prior to trial, such a filing and any opposition
to that filing, shall comply with the briefing schedule set forth in the Local Rules relating to
motions. See Local Rule 230.
2