Hall et al v. City of Fairfield et al

Filing 187

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/17/13 ORDERING that the Defendants' request for reconsideration is DENIED; the parties' joint request for additional time for voir dire and opening statements is GRANTED; the Jury Trial is confirmed to commence on 4/29/13 at 9:00 a.m. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKUS M. HALL, MONIQUE G. RANKIN, LINDSEY K. SANDERS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, No. 2:10-cv-0508 DAD v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, OFFICER NICK ORDER McDOWELL, OFFICER CHRIS GRIMM, OFFICER TOM SHACKFORD, OFFICER ZACK SANDOVAL, AND SERGEANT STEVE CRANE, Defendants. / This case came before the court on April 12, 2013, for a trial confirmation 20 hearing, and to hear argument on defendants’ request for reconsideration, for the reasons set forth 21 in defendants’ supplemental trial brief (Doc. No. 180), of the court’s January 7, 2013 order (Doc. 22 No. 173) granting partial summary judgment in favor of defendants on plaintiffs’ state law false 23 arrest claims but denying summary judgment on plaintiffs’ federal false arrest claims. Garret 24 Murai, Esq. appeared for plaintiffs and Kevin Gilbert, Esq. appeared for defendants. 25 26 Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth in detail on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 1 1. Defendants’ request for reconsideration is denied; 2 2. The parties’ joint request for additional time for voir dire and opening 3 4 statements is granted; and 3. A Jury Trial, estimated length of approximately twelve court days, is 5 confirmed to commence on April 29, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., before the undersigned. 6 DATED: April 17, 2013. 7 8 9 10 DAD:6 Ddad1\orders.consent\hall0508.oah.041213 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?