Z.F., et al v. Ripon Unified School District, et al

Filing 217

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/16/14 extending the non-expert discovery deadline until July 16, 2014 for the limited purpose of conducting the depositions of M.A.F.; J.A.; Shirley Nutt; J.F.; and Tara Sisemore-Hester only. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP G. Daniel Newland (SBN 087965) dnewland@seyfarth.com Cassandra H. Carroll (SBN 209123) ccarroll@seyfarth.com Eric M. Lloyd (SBN 254390) elloyd@seyfarth.com Matthew J. Mason (SBN 271344) mmason@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Claimants VALLEY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL CENTER, RICHARD JACOBS, and TARA SISEMORE-HESTER KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIDEMANN & GIRARD Michelle L. Cannon (SBN 172680) mcannon@kmtg.com 2390 Professional Drive Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 321-4500 Facsimile: (916) 321-4555 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS, MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION MCARTHUR & LEVIN, LLP Rodney L. Levin (SBN 169360) rod@mcarthurlevin.com 637 Santa Cruz Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030 Telephone: (408) 741-2377 Facsimile: (408) 741-2378 16 17 Attorneys for RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES and SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION 18 19 20 21 LEIGH LAW GROUP Mandy Leigh (SBN 225748) mleigh@leighlawgroup.com Jay T. Jambeck (SBN 226018) jjambeck@leighlawgroup.com 870 Market St Ste 1157 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 399-9155 Facsimile: (415) 795-3733 22 23 24 25 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter Defendants Z.F, a minor, by and through his parents M.A.F. and J.F. and M.A.F. and J.F individually; L.H. and J.H., minors, by and through their parents J.A. and J.R.H. and J.A. and J.R.H. individually; A.N., a minor, by and through his parents, G.N. and M.R., and G.N. and M.R. individually 26 27 28 3 Stipulation. re Referral to VDRP; Case No. 2:10-CV-00523-TLN-CKD 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 2 THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Z.F, a minor, by and through his parents M.A.F. ) and J.F. and M.A.F. and J.F individually; L.H. ) and J.H., minors, by and through their parents ) J.A. and J.R.H. and J.A. and J.R.H. individually; ) A.N., a minor, by and through his parents, G.N. ) and M.R., and G.N. and M.R. individually, ) ) Plaintiffs, on behalf of ) themselves and all others ) similarly situated ) ) vs. ) ) RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ) (RUSD); RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL ) DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES,; SAN ) JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF ) EDUCATION; VALLEY MOUNTAIN ) REGIONAL CENTER (VMRC), MODESTO ) CITY SCHOOLS, MODESTO CITY ) SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, ) RICHARD JACOBS, Executive Director of ) VMRC, in his official and individual capacity, ) TARA SISEMORE-HESTER, Coordinator for ) Autism Services for VMRC, in her official and ) individual capacity; VIRGINIA JOHNSON, ) Director of Modesto City Schools SELPA, in ) her official and individual capacity; SUE ) SWARTZLANDER, Program Director for ) Modesto City Schools, in her official and ) individual capacity and Does 1-200. ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 2:10-CV-00523-TLN-CKD STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF TAKING FIVE (5) REMAINING DEPOSITIONS 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 144, and subject to approval of the Court, Plaintiffs Z.F, a minor, by and through his parents M.A.F. and J.F. and M.A.F. and J.F individually; L.H. and J.H., minors, by and through their parents J.A. and J.R.H. and J.A. and J.R.H. individually; A.N., a minor, by and through his parents, G.N. and M.R., and G.N. and M.R. individually (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Modesto City Schools, Modesto City Schools Board of Education, Ripon Unified School District, Ripon Unified School District Board of Trustees and San Joaquin County Office of Education, and Valley Mountain Regional Center, Richard Jacobs, and Tara 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY DEADLINE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF THE 5 DEPOSITIONS / CASE NO. 2:10-CV-00523-TLN-CKD 1 Sisemore-Hester (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”) enter into the following stipulation 2 and respectfully request the Court’s acceptance of this stipulation: 3 1. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s January 21, 2014 Amended Pretrial 4 Scheduling Order (“Scheduling Order”), the current non-expert discovery deadline is set for June 5 16; 6 2. WHEREAS, also pursuant to the Scheduling Order, the dispositive motion 7 deadline to hear dispositive motions is December 11, 2014, and the trial in this matter is 8 currently scheduled for May 18, 2015; 9 3. WHEREAS, the Parties previously agreed to place a stay on discovery pending 10 the outcome of the Mandatory Settlement Conference, held on March 20, 2014 before the 11 Honorable Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; 12 13 14 15 16 4. WHEREAS, the Parties were unable to resolve all claims at the March 20, 2014 Mandatory Settlement Conference; 5. WHEREAS, the Parties subsequently served written discovery concerning some of the remaining issues in this matter; 6. WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Defendants/Counter-claimants VMRC, Jacobs 17 and Sisemore-Hester, who previously agreed to postpone taking depositions pertaining to their 18 Counterclaim and Complaint against counter-defendants M.A.F., J.A. and Special Needs 19 Advocates for Understanding, should have the opportunity to depose M.A.F., J.A., and non-party 20 Shirley Nutt (“Nutt”) in order to conduct adequate discovery of their counterclaims; 21 7. WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the defendants also should have the 22 opportunity to depose parent-Plaintiff J.F., whose deposition was unable to be taken previously 23 due to J.F.’s schedule and lack of availability; 24 25 26 8. WHEREAS, the Parties agree that Plaintiffs should have the opportunity to depose Ms. Sisemore-Hester, the Coordinator for Autism Services for VMRC; 9. WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and have agreed good cause 27 exists to stipulate to a continuance of the non-expert discovery deadline an additional thirty (30) 28 days for the limited purpose of conducting the depositions stated in Paragraphs 6, 7 and 8; 3 Case No. 2:10-CV-00523-TLN-CKD 1 NOW THEREFORE, all Parties hereto stipulate and agree that the Court may enter an 2 Order extending the non-expert discovery deadline until July 16, 2014 for the limited purpose of 3 conducting the depositions of (1) M.A.F.; (2) J.A.; (3) Shirley Nutt; (4) J.F.; and (5) Tara 4 Sisemore-Hester only. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 7 8 9 10 DATED: June 13, 2014 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 11 By: ______/s/ Mathew J. Mason____________ G. Daniel Newland Cassandra H. Carroll Eric M. Lloyd Matthew J. Mason Attorneys for Defendant VALLEY MOUNTAIN REGIONAL CENTER RICHARD JACOBS, and TARA SISEMORE-HESTER 12 13 14 15 16 17 DATED: June 13, 2014 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIDEMANN & GIRARD 18 19 By: ______/s/ Michelle L. Cannon__________ Michelle L. Cannon Attorneys for Defendant MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS, MODESTO CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 2:10-CV-00523-TLN-CKD 1 DATED: June 13, 2014 MCARTHUR & LEVIN, LLP 2 3 By: ______/s/ Rodney L. Levin____________ Rodney L. Levin Attorneys for Defendant RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, RIPON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION 4 5 6 7 8 DATED: June 13, 2014 LEIGH LAW GROUP 9 10 By: ______/s/ Jay T. Jambeck____________ Jay T. Jambeck Attorneys for Plaintiffs Z.F, a minor, by and through his parents M.A.F. and J.F. and M.A.F. and J.F individually; L.H. and J.H., minors, by and through their parents J.A. and J.R.H. and J.A. and J.R.H. individually; A.N., a minor, by and through his parents, G.N. and M.R., and G.N. and M.R. individually 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 16, 2014 18 19 20 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 2:10-CV-00523-TLN-CKD 17407714v.1 / 58540-000003

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?