Olvera v County of Sacramento, et al

Filing 115

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/4/2012 ORDERING #107 Documents Bates stamped nos. 003-015 and 017-027 comprise delivered service logs and chronos of Jeannine Lopez; The claims of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product are OVERRULED as to these documents and shall be produced no later than 10/10/2012; The remaining documents submitted for in camera review need not be produced; Considering all of the circumstances presented on the motion, it appears further deposition of defendants Guillon and Travis is NOT WARRANTED; The motion to compel further deposition is DENIED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EDWARD OLVERA, et al.,

11
12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,

No. 2:10-cv-0550 WBS CKD

vs.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

Plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of documents and further deposition is

17

pending before the court. Defendants have now submitted documents for in camera review

18

pursuant to the order filed September 26, 2012. Upon review of the documents in support and

19

opposition, upon in camera review of the submitted documents, and good cause appearing

20

therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

21

1. Documents Bates stamped nos. 003-015 and 017-027 comprise delivered

22

service logs and chronos of Jeannine Lopez. The claims of attorney-client privilege and attorney

23

work product are overruled as to these documents and shall be produced no later than October

24
25
26
1

1

10, 2012.1 The remaining documents submitted for in camera review need not be produced.

2

2. Considering all of the circumstances presented on the motion, it appears

3

further deposition of defendants Guillon and Travis is not warranted. The motion to compel

4

further deposition (dkt. no. 107) is denied.

5

Dated: October 4, 2012

6

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10

4 olvera2-0550.icr

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1

26

It appears that defendants’ prior production of delivered service logs may have been
incomplete. See, e.g., Defendants’ Exh. 7.
2