Randall v. The State of California
Filing
22
ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/2011 ORDERING that the 3/7/2011 order to show cause is DISCHARGED; and ptnr shall, w/in 30 days, show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot. (Yin, K)
(HC) Randall v. The State of California
Doc. 22
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. RICK HILL, Respondent. / Petitioner is a former state prisoner proceeding with a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In response to this court's order to show cause, filed March 7, 2011, petitioner has now informed the court of his change of address. Accordingly, the order to show cause is discharged. The petition for writ of habeas corpus challenges the procedure and decision of the superior court in revoking petitioner's probation and sentencing petitioner to state prison. Petitioner is now paroled. Therefore, petitioner must show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot. //// //// //// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT BERT RANDALL, Petitioner, No. 2: 10-cv-0580 GEB KJN P
ORDER and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
rand580.ord.osc
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The order to show cause filed March 7, 2011 (Dkt. No. 20) is discharged; and 2. Petitioner shall, within thirty days after the filing date of this order, show cause why this action should not be dismissed as moot. DATED: March 29, 2011
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?