Watkins v. Pope et al
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/19/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERT LOUIS WATKINS,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. CIV S-10-0620 LKK DAD PS
vs.
JAMIE POPE, et al.,
Defendants.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/
By order filed August 8, 2011, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with
17
leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff was granted thirty days from the date of the
18
order to file a second amended complaint and was cautioned that failure to respond to the court’s
19
order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The
20
thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner.
21
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States
24
District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within
25
fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file
26
written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections
1
1
to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
2
objections within the specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal
3
the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
4
DATED: September 19, 2011.
5
6
7
8
DAD:kw
Ddad1\orders.pro se\watkins0620.fta
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?