Mayo v. Recycle to Conserve
Filing
31
FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/6/11, ORDERING that the Trial is SET for 11/1/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. A Settlement Conference is SET for 10/20/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Any objections to this pretrial order shall be filed and served within five court days from the signed date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
NO. CIV. 2:10-629 WBS EFB
EDISON MAYO,
13
Plaintiff,
FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER
14
15
16
v.
RECYCLE TO CONSERVE, INC.,
Defendant.
/
17
18
19
----oo0oo---A Final Pretrial Conference was held in this matter,
20
pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of
21
Civil Procedure and Local Rule 282, on September 6, 2011.
22
Louis Bolanos appeared as counsel for plaintiff; Kelli Michelle
23
Kennaday appeared as counsel for defendant.
24
hearing, the court enters this Final Pretrial Order:
Aldon
Following the
25
I.
Jurisdiction-Venue
26
Jurisdiction is predicated upon federal question
27
jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, because plaintiff has brought a
28
claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
1
1
§§ 2000e-2, 2000e-3.
2
Venue is undisputed and is hereby found to
be proper.
3
II.
Jury-Nonjury
4
The parties have demanded a jury trial.
5
the action shall be tried, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
6
Procedure 48, before a jury consisting of no less than six and no
7
more than twelve members.
Accordingly,
8
III. Jury Instructions and Proposed Form of Verdict
9
No later than ten court days before the trial date,
10
counsel for plaintiff shall lodge and serve, pursuant to Local
11
Rule 163, copies of all jury instructions that plaintiff requests
12
be given on plaintiff’s claim.
13
plaintiff shall also file and serve a copy of a proposed form of
14
verdict.
At that time, counsel for
No later than seven court days before the trial date,
15
16
counsel for defendant shall file and serve any objections to the
17
instructions proposed by plaintiff.
18
for defendant shall lodge and serve, pursuant to Local Rule 163,
19
copies of any and all jury instructions not already proposed by
20
plaintiff, which defendant requests be given.
21
counsel for defendant shall file and serve a copy of any proposed
22
form of verdict and shall also file any objections to plaintiff’s
23
proposed form of verdict.
At the same time, counsel
Also at that time,
No later than four court days before the trial date,
24
25
counsel for plaintiff shall file and serve any objections to the
26
instructions proposed by defendant and to any proposed form of
27
verdict.
28
Pursuant to Local Rule 163, any other instructions
2
1
thereafter presented will be refused unless it is shown either:
2
(1) that the necessity for the request arose in the course of
3
trial; could not reasonably have been anticipated prior to trial
4
from the pleadings, discovery, or nature of the action; and the
5
request for such additional instructions is presented to the
6
court as promptly as possible; or (2) that the refusal to give
7
such instructions would constitute plain error.
8
9
Likewise, any objections to proposed instructions not
made in accordance with this Order will be overruled as untimely
10
unless it is shown either:
11
in the course of trial and the intention to make such objections
12
is communicated to the court as promptly as possible, or (2) that
13
the giving of such instructions would constitute plain error.
(1) that the grounds therefor arose
14
IV.
15
No later than fourteen days before the trial date,
Voir Dire Questions
16
counsel for each party shall submit all proposed jury voir dire
17
questions.
18
V.
19
No later than fourteen days before the trial date,
Trial Briefs/Motions in Limine
20
counsel for each party shall file trial briefs, which shall
21
include any motions in limine, pursuant to Local Rule 285.
22
later than seven days before trial, the parties may file
23
oppositions, if any, to the motions in limine.
No
24
VI.
Remaining Claim
25
After the court’s Order granting in part defendant’s
26
motion for summary judgment, the sole remaining claim for trial
27
is plaintiff’s claim for race discrimination under Title VII.
28
///
3
1
VII.
2
(A)
3
Plaintiff anticipates calling the witnesses
identified at Exhibit “A” attached hereto.
(B)
4
5
Witnesses
Defendant anticipates calling the witnesses
identified at Exhibit “B” attached hereto.
6
(C)
7
trial unless:
(1)
all parties stipulate that the witness may
(2)
8
9
No other witnesses will be permitted to testify at
the party offering the witness demonstrates
testify;
10
11
that the witness is for the purpose of rebutting evidence which
12
could not have been reasonably anticipated at the time of the
13
Pretrial Conference; or
(3)
14
15
16
the witness was discovered after the Pretrial
Conference.
(D)
Testimony of a witness not designated in this
17
Order, which is offered under paragraph VII(C)(3), above, upon
18
the grounds that the witness was discovered after the Pretrial
19
Conference, will not be permitted unless:
(1)
20
21
reasonably have been discovered prior to the Pretrial Conference;
22
23
the testimony of the witness could not
(2)
the court and opposing counsel were promptly
notified upon discovery of the testimony; and
(3)
24
counsel proffered the witness for deposition
25
if time permitted or provided opposing counsel a reasonable
26
summary of the testimony if time did not permit a deposition.
27
VIII.
28
(A)
Exhibits
Plaintiff intends to offer the exhibits identified
4
1
at Exhibit “C” attached hereto.
2
3
(B)
at Exhibit “D” attached hereto.
4
5
(C)
(D)
No other exhibits will be received in evidence
unless:
8
9
Each party may offer any exhibit designated by any
other party.
6
7
Defendant intends to offer the exhibits identified
(1)
all parties stipulate that the exhibit may be
received in evidence;
10
(2)
the party offering the exhibit demonstrates
11
that the exhibit is for the purpose of rebutting evidence which
12
could not have been reasonably anticipated at the time of the
13
Pretrial Conference; or
14
15
16
(3)
the exhibit was discovered after the Pretrial
Conference.
(E)
An exhibit not designated in this Order, which is
17
offered under paragraph VIII(D)(3), above, upon the grounds that
18
the exhibit was discovered after the Pretrial Conference, will
19
not be received in evidence unless:
20
21
(1)
discovered prior to the Pretrial Conference;
22
23
the exhibit could not reasonably have been
(2)
the court and opposing counsel were promptly
notified upon discovery of the exhibit; and
24
(3)
counsel provided copies of the exhibit to
25
opposing counsel if physically possible or made the exhibit
26
reasonably available for inspection by opposing counsel if
27
copying was not physically possible.
28
(F)
Each party shall exchange copies of all exhibits
5
1
identified in this Order, or make them reasonably available for
2
inspection by all other parties, no later than seven calendar
3
days before the trial date.
4
exhibits shall be filed and served not later than four calendar
5
days before the trial date.
6
(G)
Any and all objections to such
The attorney for each party is directed to appear
7
before trial and present an original (and if physically possible
8
one copy) of each exhibit to Deputy Clerk Karen Kirksey Smith at
9
8:30 a.m. on the date of trial.
10
(H)
Each exhibit which has been designated in this
11
Order and presented on the morning of the date of trial shall be
12
pre-marked by counsel.
13
defendant’s exhibits shall bear letters.
14
been made to such exhibit pursuant to paragraph VIII(F), above,
15
such exhibit will require no further foundation and will be
16
received in evidence upon the motion of any party at trial.
Plaintiff’s exhibits shall bear numbers;
If no objection has
17
IX. Further Discovery and Motions
18
No further motions shall be brought before trial except
19
upon order of the court and upon a showing of manifest injustice.
20
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(e).
21
except by the express stipulation of all parties or upon order of
22
the court and upon a showing of manifest injustice.
No further discovery will be permitted
Id.
23
X.
Use of Depositions or Interrogatories
24
No later than twenty calendar days before the trial
25
date, counsel for each party shall file and serve a statement
26
designating all answers to interrogatories and all portions of
27
depositions intended to be offered or read into evidence, with
28
the exception of portions to be used only for impeachment or
6
1
rebuttal.
2
counsel for any other party may file and serve a
3
counter-designation of other portions of the same depositions
4
intended to be offered or read into evidence and may file
5
evidentiary objections to any other parties’ designation.
6
later than seven calendar days before the trial date, the parties
7
may file evidentiary objections to any other party’s
8
counter-designation.
9
No later than ten calendar days before the trial date,
XI.
No
Date and Length of Trial
The trial is set for November 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. in
10
11
Courtroom No. 5.
The court estimates that the trial will last
12
between three and five court days.
13
XII.
Daubert Procedure
14
Any challenges based on Daubert v. Merrell Dow
15
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and Kumho Tire Co. v.
16
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999), will be raised and resolved
17
outside the presence of the jury just prior to when the
18
challenged expert will be called to give testimony.
19
challenged expert shall be present for such a challenge, and
20
shall be available for questioning.
Any
21
XIII. Evidence Presentation Equipment
22
The court has new technical equipment, but may not have
23
all of the “state-of-the-art” audio visual equipment and may not
24
have support personnel necessary for the effective presentation
25
of evidence by electronic means.
26
encouraged to present their documentary evidence by conventional
27
means.
28
necessary, they should contact the Courtroom Deputy prior to
Counsel are therefore
If any party feels that electronic presentation is
7
1
trial to determine what equipment the court has and how to use
2
that equipment or bring their own audio visual equipment to the
3
courtroom and be prepared to operate it themselves.
4
XIV. Settlement Conference
5
A Settlement Conference is set before Magistrate Judge
6
Edmund F. Brennan at 10:00 a.m. on October 20, 2011.
7
Each party is ordered to have a principal with full
8
settlement authority present at the conference or be fully
9
authorized to settle the matter on any terms.
No later than
10
seven days before the date of the Settlement Conference, counsel
11
for each party shall submit a confidential Settlement Conference
12
Statement to the settlement judge.
13
filed, but shall be delivered to the chambers of the settlement
14
judge, in hard copy.
Such statements shall not be
15
XV.
16
Any objections or suggested modifications to this
Objections to Pretrial Order
17
Pretrial Order shall be filed and served within five court days
18
from the signed date of this Order.
19
date of this Order shall refer to the date the tentative order is
20
filed and not to the date any amended order is filed.
21
objections or modifications are made, this Order will become
22
final without further order of the court and shall control the
23
subsequent course of the action, pursuant to Rule 16(e) of the
24
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
25
DATED:
September 6, 2011
26
27
28
8
All references herein to the
If no
1
Exhibit “A”: Plaintiff’s Witnesses
2
3
A.
Edison Mayo
4
B.
Joseph Serpo
5
C.
Sean O’Dahl (Hostile Witness)
6
D.
Kevin Christian (Hostile Witness)
7
E.
“Ralph”
8
F.
Any witness in defendant’s witness list.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
1
Exhibit “B”: Defendant’s Witnesses
2
3
1.
Robert McMullin, 2811 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 410, Santa
Monica, CA 90403.
4
5
2.
Sean Odahl, 704 Zephyr Street, Stockton, CA 95206.
6
3.
Kevin Christian, 704 Zephyr Street, Stockton, CA 95206.
7
4.
Ralph Lantz, 704 Zephyr Street, Stockton, CA 95206.
8
5.
Kimberly Mayo, 3406 Mary Avenue, Stockton, CA 95206.
9
6.
Elwood Lindsay, 2459 Jensen Court, Valley Springs, CA 95252.
10
7.
Rida Hamed, 2811 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 410, Santa
11
Monica, CA 90403.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
1
Exhibit “C”: Plaintiff’s Exhibits
2
3
1.
June 6, 2007, Employee Warning Notice
4
2.
October 30, 2009, Separation Notice
5
3.
August 18, 2005, Accident Policy
6
4.
Ralph Lantz Accident Data, RTC 000138-RTC000145
7
5.
Jaunary 9, 2007, Small Claims File Mayo v. Christian.
8
6.
June 29, 2007, Employee Warning Notice, RTC0000004.
9
7.
January 9, 2001, Employee Commendation, RTC000005.
10
8.
September 20, 2006, Rate Increase, RTC000009.
11
9.
August 30, 2005, Rate Increase, RTC0000010.
12
10.
September 6, 2001, Rate Increase, RTC000012.
13
11.
September 30, 2000, Rate Increase, RTC000013.
14
12.
October 28, 1998, Medical Coverage Document, RTC000039.
15
13.
Direct Deposit Sheet.
16
14.
Employment Earnings Verification, RTC000042.
17
15.
Blue Cross Application. RTC000049.
18
16.
Life Insurance Application.
19
17.
Ameritas Group Enrollment Form.
20
18.
Employment Application.
21
19.
Accident Report. RTC000057-61.
22
20.
EDD Letter.
23
21.
Dext Job Description and Safety Training.
24
22.
Letter from Elwood Lindsey.
25
23.
Employee Handbook.
RTC000041.
RTC000051.
RTC000052.
RTC000053.
RTC000064.
RTC000076-77.
RTC000080-136.
26
27
28
11
RTC000071-72.
1
Exhibit “D”: Defendant’s Exhibits
2
3
1.
Plaintiff’s DFEH Complaint.
4
2.
Letter from Kimberly Mayo. (RTC000079)
5
3.
Employee Warning Notice dated 7/6/07 (RTC000004)
6
4.
Scope Industries’ EEO-1 Report for 2009. (RTC000189-205)
7
5.
Recycle to Conserve memo to all drivers from Brian de Kruyf
8
dated 8/18/2005 regarding Accident Policy, signed by Edison
9
Mayo on September 15, 2005. (RTC000001)
10
6.
11
12
2005. (RTC000003)
7.
13
14
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Employee Acknowledgement form for Employee Handbook, signed
by Edison Mayo, on 3/13/02. (RTC000069)
14.
27
28
Scope Products, Inc. Employee Handbook, issue date 1/1/2002.
(RTC000080-135)
25
26
Note from Kimberly Mayo to Recycle to Conserve regarding
Edison Mayo, received June 2, 2010. (RTC000078)
23
24
Supervisor’s Incident Investigation Report, dated 10/22/09.
(RTC000061)
21
22
Accident Report-Wausau Insurance Companies regarding 6/18/07
accident. (RTC000060)
19
20
Automobile Loss Notice, Driver Statement and Diagram, signed
by Edison Mayo on 10/22/2009. (RTC000057)
17
18
Employee Separation Notice for Edison Mayo, dated October
30, 2009. (RTC000138)
15
16
Cellphone Use Policy, signed by Edison Mayo on February 16,
Acknowledgment of New or Revised Policy, signed by Edison
Mayo on 8/29/2000. (RTC000073)
15.
Faults Information and Oil Analysis for truck driven by
12
1
2
Plaintiff. (RTC000181-183)
16.
3
4
5
Bakery Activity Report for Cottage Bakery route from July 5,
2009 through December 31, 2009. (RTC000184-188)
17.
Repair records and damage photographs for truck driven by
Plaintiff. (RTC000146-180)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?