Dixon v. Yates

Filing 42

ORDER ADOPTING 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/10/2014. The previously-issued 20 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED and respondent's 8 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK DIXON, No. 2:10-cv-0631 JAM AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 JAMES YATES, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 19 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 21 22 23 24 On January 8, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Respondent was granted two extensions of time1 to file objections to the findings and recommendations and has done so. Petitioner has filed a reply to the objections. 25 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 28 1 ECF Nos. 37, 39. 1 1 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 8, 2014, are adopted in full; 5 2. The previously-issued Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 20) are vacated; and 6 3. The motion to dismiss (ECF No. 8) is denied. 7 DATED: June 10, 2014 8 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?