Dixon v. Yates
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/28/2015 DIRECTING the Clerk to strike 83 petitioner's brief filed on 9/29/2015 from the record. Petitioner shall, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday 10/30/2015, correct the record by filing his reply brief dated 9/29/2015. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRANK DIXON,
12
No. 2:10-cv-0631 JAM AC P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
JAMES YATES,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
Following the evidentiary hearing in this case, the parties were ordered to submit post-
18
hearing briefing. ECF No. 73. It has come to the court’s attention that the reply brief filed by
19
petitioner on September 29, 2015 (ECF No. 83), is identical to the opening brief filed on
20
September 8, 2015 (ECF No. 81). It appears that petitioner inadvertently re-filed his opening
21
brief. The courtesy copy of the reply brief received by the court appears to be the document
22
petitioner intended to file.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike petitioner’s brief filed on September 29,
25
2015 (ECF No. 83) from the record.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
2. Petitioner shall, no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 30, 2015, correct the record
2
by filing his reply brief dated September 29, 2015.
3
DATED: October 28, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?