Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Vision Service Plan et al

Filing 77

STIPULATION and ORDER 76 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/13/10: Dft shall answer or move to dismiss the amended complaint by 9/30/10. (Kastilahn, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

KATHLEEN E. FINNERTY - (SBN 157638) (Counsel for Service) ROGER B. KAPLAN (RK 6985) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 1201 K Street, Suite 1100 Sacramento, CA 95814-3938 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail], [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC. Plaintiff, v. VISION SERVICE PLAN; Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:10 CV 00632 JAM - GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR MOVE TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

The parties hereby STIPULATE and AGREE that the time within which Defendant shall answer or move to dismiss the Amended Complaint shall be and hereby is extended to and including September 30, 2010. Dated: September 13, 2010 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP By:/s/ Kathleen E. Finnerty Roger B. Kaplan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Kathleen E. Finnerty (SBN 157638) Nancy J. Doig (SBN 226593) Attorneys for Plaintiff ASPEX EYEWEAR, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Dated: September 10, 2010

REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C. By:/s/ Scott W. Hansen-as authorized on 9/10/10 Scott W. Hansen (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant VISION SERVICE PLAN

The foregoing shall be and hereby is SO ORDERED on this 13th day of September 2010: /s/ John A. Mendez____________ United States District Court Judge

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com