Han, et a., v. City of Folsom, et al,.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 9/7/11 ORDERING that plaintiffs are authorized to file a brief in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment not to exceed 30 pages. (Kastilahn, A)

1

4

JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar #69888
BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar #222173
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2
3

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11

YOUNG HAN, individually, and as successorin-interest to Decedent JOSEPH HAN; NAM
HAN; DAVID HAN,
Plaintiffs,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Case No. 10-00633-MCE GGH
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR PAGE
LIMIT INCREASE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; ORDER THEREON

vs.
CITY OF FOLSOM, a municipal corporation;
SAMUEL L. SPIEGEL, in his capacity as Chief
of Police for the CITY OF FOLSOM; PAUL
BARBER, individually and in his capacity as a
police officer for the CITY OF FOLSOM;
DAREN PROCIW, individually and his official
capacity as a police officer for the CITY OF
FOLSOM; RON PETERSON, individually and
in his capacity as a sergeant of police for the
CITY OF FOLSOM, and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

20
21

Defendants.

22
23

Plaintiffs hereby request leave of the Court for an increase in the 20-page limitation on their

24

Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Judgment, to authorize an opposition brief not to exceed 30

25

pages. The requested increase is necessary to address and oppose at least five different substantive

26

legal issues defendants have raised in their 27 page brief, and to correct defendants’

27

misrepresentations and omissions of material facts in this action.

28

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 2:10-CV-00633-FCD-GGH

1

1

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs respectfully request leave of the Court for an Order

2

authorizing a brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment not to exceed thirty

3

(30) pages.

4
5
6

Dated: August 25, 2011

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS

7

/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum
Benjamin Nisenbaum
Attorney for Plaintiffs

8
9
10
11

ORDER

12

PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST, Plaintiffs are hereby authorized to file a brief

13
14

in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment not to exceed thirty (30) pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16
17

Dated: September 7, 2011

18

__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
DEAC_Signature-END:

21
22
23

c4d6b0d3

24
25
26
27
28

PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 2:10-CV-00633-FCD-GGH

2