Solis v. Medonld

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/03/12 ordering that since the entry of judgment, petitioner has filed several documents with the court "responding" to the order of dismissal and inquiring about the status of his appeal or "motion." Docket Number 34 - 36 . Petitioner is hereby advised that documents filed by him with this court since the closing date of this action will be disregarded and no further orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ALLEN SOLIS,
Petitioner,

11
vs.

12
13

No. 2:10-cv-00637-KJM-DAD P

MIKE McDONALD, Warden,
Respondent.

14

ORDER
/

15

On March 21, 2012 the District Judge assigned to this action adopted the

16
17

undersigned’s August 2, 2011 findings and recommendations in full and dismissed petitioner’s

18

second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus as barred by the applicable statute of

19

limitations. (Dkt. No. 32.) In that order the assigned District Judge also determined that a

20

certificate of appealability would not issue in this action. (Id.) Judgment was entered and the

21

case was closed that same day. (Dkt. No. 33.)
Since the entry of judgment, petitioner has filed several documents with the court

22
23

“responding” to the order of dismissal and inquiring about the status of his appeal or “motion.”

24

(Dkt. Nos. 34-36.) Petitioner is hereby advised that documents filed by him with this court since

25

the closing date of this action will be disregarded and no further orders will issue

26

/////

1

in response to future filings. Petitioner is also advised that he may seek a certificate of

2

appealability from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

3

DATED: December 3, 2012.

4
5
6
7

DAD:4
sol0637.158

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2