James v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/30/13 ORDERING that The parties January 28, 2013 request to modify the courts scheduling order 50 is GRANTED; The courts scheduling order, filed on September 12, 2012, is modified as follows: The March 22, 2013 deadline to file and serve all pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, is vacated and the deadline to file and serve for all pretrial motions is reset for May 17, 2013. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of the courts order filed August 3, 2011.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JAMES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-00664 MCE DAD P vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 The parties have filed a stipulation and proposed order modifying the scheduling 17 order filed on September 12, 2012 in this action. The parties intend to participate in voluntary 18 mediation on March 25, 2013 and request that the deadline to file and serve dispositive motions 19 therefore be extended to May 17, 2013. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 21 1. The parties’ January 28, 2013 request to modify the court’s scheduling order (Doc. No. 50) is granted; 22 2. The court’s scheduling order, filed on September 12, 2012, is modified as 23 follows: The March 22, 2013 deadline to file and serve all pretrial motions, except motions to 24 compel discovery, is vacated and the deadline to file and serve for all pretrial motions is reset for 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 May 17, 2013. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of the court’s order filed 2 August 3, 2011. 3 DATED: January 30, 2013. 4 5 6 DAD:4 jame664.36sche 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?