Munns et al v. Clinton et al
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/9/15: Plaintiffs' due process and takings claims are hereby SEVERED from the remainder of this case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to TRANSFER those claims to the United States Court of Federal Claims and to close this case. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK MUNNS, et al.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:10-cv-00681-MCE-EFB
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
HILLARY DIANE RODHAM CLINTON,
in her official capacity as United States
Secretary of State, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
On March 27, 2012, this Court granted without leave to amend the Government
19
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 53. Plaintiffs thereafter voluntarily dismissed
20
their claims against all remaining Defendants and perfected an appeal. ECF Nos. 54,
21
66, 69. In March of this year, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision
22
affirming this Court’s “dismissal of the plaintiffs’ equitable claims due to lack of standing
23
and their federal benefits claims due to lack of jurisdiction.” Munns v. Kerry, 782 F.3d
24
402, 415 (2015). The appellate court vacated and remanded, however, as to the
25
“dismissal of the due process and takings claims for withheld backpay and insurance
26
proceeds” and directed this Court “to sever [those] claims from the remainder of the
27
case, and to transfer them to the Court of Federal Claims.” Id.1
28
1
The formal mandate has since been issued. ECF No. 75.
1
1
Accordingly, in keeping with the appellate court’s directive, Plaintiffs’ due process
2
and takings claims are hereby SEVERED from the remainder of this case. The Clerk of
3
the Court is directed to TRANSFER those claims to the United States Court of Federal
4
Claims and to close this case.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 9, 2015
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?