Jacob v. Ramirez et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/14/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 21 are adopted in full; Defendants motion to dismiss 18 is denied; and Defendants shall answer plaintiff's amended complaint within ten days from the date of this order. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MICHAEL C. JACOB,

11

Plaintiff,
vs.

12
13

No. 2:10-cv-0692 FCD DAD (PC)

M. T. RAMIREZ, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

16
17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 24, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

19
20

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

21

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither

22

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

23
24

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

25

ORDERED that:

26

/////
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 24, 2011, are adopted in full;

2

2. Defendants’ December 21, 2010 motion to dismiss is denied; and

3

3. Defendants shall answer plaintiff’s amended complaint within ten days from

4

the date of this order.

5

DATED: April 14, 2011.

6
7
8

_______________________________________
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2