Johnson v. Alameda Superior Court of California et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/29/2010 ORDERING that this action be DISMISSED w/ prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

(PC) Johnson v. Alameda Superior Court of California et al

Doc. 21

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. WARDEN MARTEL, et al., Defendants. / On March 29, 2010, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #8). By order filed July 13, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file a second amended complaint. In the July 13th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his amended complaint. On July 29, 2010, plaintiff filed a response to the screening order that could be construed as a second amended complaint, but the court deemed it entirely insufficient and granted plaintiff an additional twenty-eight days to file a second amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DARRELL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0699 GGH P

ORDER

1 2 3 4

For the reasons given in the July 13, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: October 29, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

5 6
GGH:035

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
john0699.fta

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2